Lebeaupin v Crispin & Company
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1920 |
Year | 1920 |
Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
- New Chew v KBC Sawmill Sdn Bhd and Another and Another Case
-
CTI Group Inc. v Transclear SA (The Mary Nour)
...contracted in unqualified terms, the seller took the risk of being able to obtain the goods needed to perform his contract. 17 In Lebeaupin v Crispin [1920] 2 K.B. 714 the defendant entered into two contracts with the plaintiff, one for the sale of the first 2,500 cases of 1/2 lb. tins of F......
-
CTI Group Inc. v Transclear SA (The Mary Nour)
...were applied to him. 33 In support of his submission that PTS's “default” was attributable to the sellers Mr Kenny cited Lebeaupin v Richard Crispin and Company [1920] 2 KB 714. Here there were two contracts each of which was for the sale of 2500 cases of “British Columbia Fraser river salm......
- Fyffes Group Ltd v Reefer Express Lines Pty. Ltd (Kriti R)
Request a trial to view additional results
13 firm's commentaries
-
Force Majeure Clauses
...the traditional catch-all phrase. Footnotes 1 Matsoukis v Priestman & Co [1915] 1 KB 681 at 685-7 2 Lebeaupin v Richard Crispin [1920] 2 KB 714 at 719 3 Coloniale Import-Export v Loumidis Sons [1978] 2 Lloyd's Rep 560 4 Toepfer v Cremer [1975] 2 Lloyd's Rep 118 5 [1915] 1 KB 681 at 687 ......
-
COVID-19 – Issues Affecting Performance Of Contractual Obligations In Construction Contracts Governed By English Law
...1920 15 JCT clause references below have been taken from the 2011 edition of the Standard Form of Building Contract with Quantities. 16 [1920] 2 K.B. 714 (18 June 1920). 8 and is a little stale. In the case, the High Court explicitly held that “epidemics are cases of force majeure”.17 Howev......
-
COVID-19 – Issues Affecting Performance Of Contractual Obligations In Construction Contracts: A Comparison Between English And Malaysian Law
...of time (upon giving notice). The precise extension is determined by the architect or administrator (clauses 2.27 to 2.28). 22 [1920] 2 K.B. 714 (18 June 1920). 23 Ibid. 12 At first, the only consequence of this is that deadlines for performance are deferred to a later date. The substance o......
-
Force majeure clauses and COVID-19 ' What you need to know now about your contracts
...Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl Gmbh (1962) AC 93. 8 Matsoukis v Priestman & Co (1915) 1 KB 681. 9 Lebeaupin v Richard Crispin & Co (1920) 2 KB 714. 10The Commissioner of Railways (WA) v Stewart and Others (1936) 56 CLR This publication does not deal with every important topic or change......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Frustration
...and a funeral; the phrase did apply, however, to delay caused by a breakdown in machinery). 179 Lebeaupin v Richard Crispin & Co , [1920] 2 KB 714 at 721, McCardie J [ Lebeaupin ]. See also The Concadoro , [1960] 2 AC 199 (PC) (failure of master of ship to leave on voyage because of insuff......