Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1962 |
| Date | 1962 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
141 cases
- Da Costa v R
-
R v Acott
...resulting in a loss of self control, there is simply no issue of provocation to be considered by the jury: Lee Chun-Chuen v. The Queen [1963] A.C. 220, 229, per Lord Devlin. 23 Standing back from the minutiae of section 3 A.J. Ashworth (now Professor Ashworth) described the core features of......
-
The Queen v Jay Marie Chin
...... further explored in the case of Lee Chun-Chuen v. Reginam (1963) 1 All E R 79 where the court ......
-
Shonovia Thomas Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...1 [1957] AC 635, 642, 2 [1946] AC 83, 91–92. 3 [1915] 2 KB 431. 4 [1942] AC 1, 7. 5 [1996] 1 Cr App R 229. 6 Act No. 1 of 1997. 7 (1963) AC 220. 8 (2005) UKPC 23, (2005) 2 AC 580, para. 9 (2011) UKPC 15. 10 [2005] EWCA Crim 1728. 11 At para. 35. 12 See Record of Appeal Volume 4, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Codifying the Law on Evidential Burdens
...by pointing to material in the prosecutioncase that supports the defence or, at least, ‘induces a reasonable doubt’: Lee Chun-Chuen v R [1963] AC 220 at 229, per Lord Devlin. For example, evidence adducedby the prosecution in support of a charge of ‘murder’ may suggest a defence ofprovocati......
-
Provocation: a totally flawed defence that has no place in Australian criminal law irrespective of sentencing regime.
...(120) Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158, 161-162,169; R v Stingel (1990) 171 CLR 312, 334. (121) Lee Chun-Chuen v The Queen [1963] AC 220, 233; Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158, (122) Stingel v R (1990) 171 CLR 312, 333, 334. (123) See, for example, s 43BT Evidential bu......