Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1962 |
Date | 1962 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
162 cases
- Da Costa v R
-
Dayal v State
...before there was time for his passion to cool. These elements as per the decision of Lord Devlin in Lee Chun-Chuen —y- R [1963] 1 AER 73, [1963] AC 220 are not detached. Their relationship to each otherparticularly in point of time is of importance. This necessitates me to examine in detail......
-
R v Acott
...resulting in a loss of self control, there is simply no issue of provocation to be considered by the jury: Lee Chun-Chuen v. The Queen [1963] A.C. 220, 229, per Lord Devlin. 23 Standing back from the minutiae of section 3 A.J. Ashworth (now Professor Ashworth) described the core features of......
-
The Queen v Jay Marie Chin
... ... further explored in the case of Lee Chun-Chuen v. Reginam (1963) 1 All E R 79 where the court ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1963
...90 Lawal & Ors. v. Youman & Ors. (1961) All N.L.R. 245, (F.S.C.); (1959) W.N.L.R. 155 (High Court). 109 Lee Chun-Chuen v. Regina (1963) 1 All E.R. 73, 79. 265 Liadi Giwa v. Bisiriyu 0. Erinmilokun (1961) All N.L.R. 294, 296. 90 London C.C. v. Cattermoles (Garages) Ltd. 1953 2 A.E.R. 582. 5 ......
-
Codifying the Law on Evidential Burdens
...by pointing to material in the prosecutioncase that supports the defence or, at least, ‘induces a reasonable doubt’: Lee Chun-Chuen v R [1963] AC 220 at 229, per Lord Devlin. For example, evidence adducedby the prosecution in support of a charge of ‘murder’ may suggest a defence ofprovocati......
-
Table of Cases
...549 Layiwola & Ors. v. The Queen (1959) 1 N.S.C.C. 95; (1959) 4 F.S.C. 119.............215 Lee Chun Chuen v. R. (1962) 3 W.L.R. 1461..................................................415 Lekwot v. Judicial Tribunal (1993) 2 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 276) 410…………......52, 60 Leo O.C. Obijuru v. I.M. Ozim......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...hedid?"Disproportionate retaliationwould be a relevant factor. This is in line with Lord Devlin'sanalysis in Lee Chun-Chuen v. The Queen ]1963]A.c.220 -"provocation in law consists mainly of three elements - theact of provocation, the loss of self-control, both active and reason-able, and t......
Request a trial to view additional results