Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1962
Date1962
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
141 cases
  • Da Costa v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Acott
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 February 1997
    ...resulting in a loss of self control, there is simply no issue of provocation to be considered by the jury: Lee Chun-Chuen v. The Queen [1963] A.C. 220, 229, per Lord Devlin. 23 Standing back from the minutiae of section 3 A.J. Ashworth (now Professor Ashworth) described the core features of......
  • The Queen v Jay Marie Chin
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • High Court
    • 23 February 2012
    ...... further explored in the case of Lee Chun-Chuen v. Reginam (1963) 1 All E R 79 where the court ......
  • Shonovia Thomas Appellant v The Queen Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal
    • 27 August 2012
    ...1 [1957] AC 635, 642, 2 [1946] AC 83, 91–92. 3 [1915] 2 KB 431. 4 [1942] AC 1, 7. 5 [1996] 1 Cr App R 229. 6 Act No. 1 of 1997. 7 (1963) AC 220. 8 (2005) UKPC 23, (2005) 2 AC 580, para. 9 (2011) UKPC 15. 10 [2005] EWCA Crim 1728. 11 At para. 35. 12 See Record of Appeal Volume 4, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Codifying the Law on Evidential Burdens
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The Nbr. 72-4, August 2008
    • 1 August 2008
    ...by pointing to material in the prosecutioncase that supports the defence or, at least, ‘induces a reasonable doubt’: Lee Chun-Chuen v R [1963] AC 220 at 229, per Lord Devlin. For example, evidence adducedby the prosecution in support of a charge of ‘murder’ may suggest a defence ofprovocati......
  • Provocation: a totally flawed defence that has no place in Australian criminal law irrespective of sentencing regime.
    • Australia
    • University of Western Sydney Law Review Nbr. 14, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...(120) Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158, 161-162,169; R v Stingel (1990) 171 CLR 312, 334. (121) Lee Chun-Chuen v The Queen [1963] AC 220, 233; Van Den Hoek v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 158, (122) Stingel v R (1990) 171 CLR 312, 333, 334. (123) See, for example, s 43BT Evidential bu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT