Lee v K. Carter Ltd, and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1948
Date1948
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Pimms Ltd v Tallow Chandlers Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 13 March 1964
    ...decisions of the Court of Appeal, Swanson v. Forton, ( 1949 Chancery Division, page 143), and ( Lee v. K. Carter Limited 1949 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 85). In the latter case, after referring to Houlder Brothers & Company Limited v. Gibbs and Bates v. Donaldson, Lorn Justice Tuc......
  • Bickel v Duke of Westminster
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 July 1976
    ...end" of the contractual term, made for the purpose of givingthe assignee the benefit of the Acts. Such is said to be the result of Lee v. K. Garter Ltd, (1949) 1 King's Bench, 85; Swans on v. Forton, (1949) Chancery, 144; Dollar v. Winston, (1950) Chancery, 240. Those decisions are said to......
  • Drive Yourself Hire Company (London) Ltd v Strutt
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 24 November 1953
    ...have refused to give consent; because Commander Dugdale would have become a protected tenant whereas Wroxall Ltd., were unprotected, Lee v. Carter 1949, 1 King's Bench, p. 85. 20 Notwithstanding the fact that Wroxall Ltd., did not obtain the consent of the superior landlord in accordance wi......
  • Welch v Birrane
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • PAN ASIAN AFRICAN CO. LTD. V. NICON
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1982 Cases reported in 1982
    • 22 November 2022
    ...2 K.B. 266. 35.Skinner v. Geary (1933) 2 K.B. 546. 36.Hicks v. Scarsdale Brewery Co. (1924) N.N. 189. 20 37. Lee v. K. Carter Ltd. (1949) 1 K.B. 85. 38.Dawodu v. ljale (1946) 12 W A.C.A. 12 at 13. 39.Strutt v. Panther (1953) 1 Q.B. 397. 40.Hemmings And Wife v. Stoke Poges Gulf Club (1920) 1......