Leeds Permanent Building Society v Procter
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 30 July 1982 |
Date | 30 July 1982 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
- Infra Quest Sdn Bhd v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
-
ZF v Comptroller of Income Tax
...of Income Tax [2006] 1 SLR (R) 484; [2006] 1 SLR 484 (refd) Leeds Permanent Building Society v Procter (H M Inspector of Taxes) [1982] 3 All ER 925 (refd) Munby v Furlong (Inspector of Taxes) [1977] 1 Ch 359 (refd) NP v Comptroller of Income Tax [2007] 4 SLR (R) 599; [2007] 4 SLR 599 (refd)......
-
Blue Circle Cement Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue
...Ltd [1982] 2 All ER 230, a decision of the House of Lords, and in Leeds Permanent Building Society v Procter (Inspector of Taxes) [1982] 3 All ER 925, a decision given in the Chancery The starting point of these decisions has, almost without exception, been a dictum of LINDLEY LJ in Yarmout......
-
Blue Circle Cement Ltd v Commissioner for Inland Revenue
...Ltd [1982] 2 All ER 230, a decision of the House of Lords, and in Leeds Permanent Building Society v Procter (Inspector of Taxes) [1982] 3 All ER 925, a decision given in the Chancery The starting point of these decisions has, almost without exception, been a dictum of LINDLEY LJ in Yarmout......