Lenovo v Ericsson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division (Patents Court)
JudgeMr Justice Richards
Judgment Date19 November 2024
Neutral Citation[2024] EWHC 2941 (Pat)
Docket NumberCase No: HP-2023-000036

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Marsh Ltd v Greensill Bank AG (a company incorporated in Germany, in Insolvency Administration, acting by its Insolvency Administrator)
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 3 December 2024
    ...from the question of whether there should be summary judgment”. By contrast, in Lenovo Group Ltd v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson [2024] EWHC 2941 (Pat), Richards J held at [12]–[13] that where a particular declaration was sought, pending a FRAND trial, which would not be revisited, he was......
  • Lenovo Group Ltd v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 February 2025
    ...(“Lenovo”) an interim licence (or, to be more exact, cross-licence) for the reasons given in his judgment dated 19 November 2024 [2024] EWHC 2941 (Pat). The essential question on the appeal is whether Panasonic v Xiaomi was a decision confined to the specific facts of that case, as Ericsson......
  • Alcatel Lucent Sas v Amazon Digital UK Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 January 2025
    ...v Xiaomi took three days. A more recent application for an interim licence in Lenovo Group Ltd v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson [2024] EWHC 2941 (Pat) also occupied the Patents Court for three days. I see no reason why Amazon's application should take longer to determine, and I would expec......
  • Lenovo Group Limited & Ors v Ericsson Limited & Anor
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 19 November 2024
    ...consider for themselves. I conclude that considerations of comity and utility point against the making of the Declaration. DISPOSITION[2024] EWHC 2941 (Pat) Case No: HP-2023-000036 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES INTELLECTUAL ......