Lepre v Lepre

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1962
Year1962
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...P. 124; [1950] 2 All E.R. 297, C.A. Lee v. Lau [1967] P. 14; [1964] 3 W.L.R. 750; [1964] 2 All E.R. 248. Lepre v. Lepre [1965] P. 52; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 735; [1963] 2 All E.R. 49. Morgan v. Morgan (orse. Ransom) [1959] P. 92; [1959] 2 W.L.R. 487; [1959] 1 All E.R. 539. Ogden v. Ogden (orse. Ph......
  • Indyka v Indyka
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 Mayo 1967
    ...however, always be subject to the proviso that the foreign decree is not vitiated by fraud or is contrary to natural justice (compare Lepre v. Lepre [1965] P.52). In his speech in Salvesen's case in [1927] A.C. Lord Haldane (at page 659) said: "Our courts … never inquire whether a competen......
  • Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 7 Abril 1982
    ...jurisdiction ( In re Macartney [1921] 1 Ch. 522; see also Gray (orse. Formosa) v. Formosa [1963] P. 259, as explained in Lepre v. Lepre [1965] P. 52, 64–65); and the leading textbooks acknowledge this exception to the general recognition rules (see, e.g., Dicey & Morris Conflict of Laws 10......
  • Qureshi v Qureshi
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ...[1968] 1 All E.R. 20, C.A. Langley's Settlement Trusts, In re [1962] Ch. 541; [1961] 3 W.L.R. 1169; [1961] 3 All E.R. 803, C.A. Lepre v. Lepre [1965] P. 52; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 735; [1963] 2 All E.R. 49. Lord v. Colvin (1859) 4 Drew 366. Lyell v. Kennedy (1889) 14 App.Cas. 437, H.L.(E.). McGowa......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 Septiembre 2010
    ...1920, [2007] Q.J. No. 8498, 2007 QCCA 1092, aff’g [2005] J.Q. no. 9806 (C.S.)..................................... 191 Lepre v. Lepre, [1965] P. 52 .................................................................421, 438, 439 Leufkens v. Alba Tours International Inc. (2002), 60 O.R. (3d) 8......
  • Nullity
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 Septiembre 2010
    ...recognize a foreign decree if it contravened English views of substantial justice. 71 In 64 See Chapter 8, Section C. 65 Lepre v. Lepre , [1965] P. 52 at 63 [ Lepre ]. 66 [1977] 2 S.C.R. 218 [ Powell ]. 67 In Beals v. Saldanha , [2003] 3 S.C.R. 416, the leading decision on the enforcement o......
  • Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 Septiembre 2010
    ...Contrast Qureshi , above note 68. 106 [1971] P. 298. 107 Ibid . at 307. 108 Gray v. Formosa , [1963] P. 259 (C.A.) and Lepre v. Lepre , [1965] P. 52. See the discussion of these authorities in Chapter 23, Section E. The courts derived this defence from dicta in Pemberton v. Hughes , [1899] ......
  • Contextualizing the Pattaya summit debacle: four April days, four Thai pathologies.
    • Singapore
    • Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 31 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 Agosto 2009
    ...(2) Marc Bloch, Feudal Society, Volume I: The Growth of Ties of Dependence, translated by L.A. Manyon (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965), p. 52. Bloch's words gained currency in the study of Southeast Asia, of course, as the epigraph at the beginning of Clifford Geertz, Agricultural......
  • Get Started for Free