Lewis v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 2010 |
Neutral Citation | [2010] EWHC 1749 (Admin) |
Date | 2010 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R (on the Application of L) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Return of Person Removed: Discretion)
...Kiarie and Byndloss questions) Nigeria [2018] UKUT 115 (IAC); [2018] Imm AR 976 Lewis v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1749 (Admin) Niaz (NIAA 2002 s.104: pending appeal) [2019] UKUT 399 (IAC); [2020] Imm AR 447 PN v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] ......
-
The Queen (on the application of YZ (China)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...that there were differences between this case and the cases of R (CM (Jamaica) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 160 and R (Lewis) v SSHD [2010] EWHC 1749 (Admin), to which I will return, and he observed that these types of case are fact sensitive. He considered it relevant, though not determinative, ......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2020-07-10, [2020] UKUT 267 (IAC) (R (on the application of L) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (return of person removed: discretion))
...however, be a “highly material factor against the exercise of such discretion”: Lewis v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1749 (Admin). (3) Where P’s removal was unlawful, by reference to the position at the time of removal, that fact should not only constitute the star......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2020-07-10, [2020] UKUT 267 (IAC) (R (on the application of L) v Secretary of State for the Home Department)
...however, be a “highly material factor against the exercise of such discretion”: Lewis v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1749 (Admin). (3) Where P’s removal was unlawful, by reference to the position at the time of removal, that fact should not only constitute the star......