Lim Chin Aik v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1963 |
| Date | 1963 |
| Year | 1963 |
| Court | Privy Council |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
151 cases
- Mohamed Ibrahim v PP
-
Public Prosecutor v Ng Kwok Chun and Another
...knowledge of the law which prohibited the import of diamorphine into Singapore, counsel made reference to the case of Lim Chin Aik v R [1963] AC 160 In that case, it was held that the accused could not be guilty of entering and remaining in Singapore contrary to an order made under the Sing......
- Iannella v French
-
Cheong Seok Leng v Public Prosecutor
... ... Assignment under s 5(b) ... Commandant ... Vigilante Corps ... I, Chua Sian Chin, Minister for Home Affairs, in pursuance of the provisions of s 5(b) of the Vigilante Corps Act, hereby assign to the Vigilante Corps with effect ... ...
Get Started for Free
11 books & journal articles
-
Lawmakers, Law Lords and Legal Fault: Two Tales from the (Thames) River Bank: Sexual Offences Act 2003; R v G and Another
...regard to matters of immigration law, had laid thefoundations for the opinion of Lord Evershed and the Privy Council in Lim ChinAik v R[1963] AC 160 in interpreting s. 6(2) of the Singapore ImmigrationOrdinance 1952. In the context of less serious crimes, such as the control ofunderage gamb......
-
The Prohibited Act, or Actus Reus
...be that it would be impossible for a person to ascertain 86 Ibid at 368. 87 R v Ross (1944), 84 CCC 107 (BC Co Ct); Lim Chin Aik v R , [1963] AC 160 (PC); R v Catholique (1980), 49 CCC (2d) 65 (NWTSC). See also Statutory Instruments Act , RSC 1985, c S-22, s 11(2). The Prohibited Act, or Ac......
-
Table of Cases
...Lévis (City) v Tétreault, [2006] 1 SCR 420, 207 CCC (3d) 1, 2006 SCC 12 ..... 109, 114, 139, 245, 252, 272, 562, 563 Lim Chin Aik v R, [1963] AC 160, [1963] 1 All ER 223, [1963] 2 WLR 42 (PC) ................................................................................. 112 London (City)......
-
Table of cases
...1 SCR 420, 207 CCC (3d) 1, 2006 SCC 12 ...................................114, 119, 145, 257, 264, 286, 592, 593, 601 Lim Chin Aik v R, [1963] AC 160, [1963] 1 All ER 223, [1963] 2 WLR 42 (PC) ..................................................................................116 London (City......
Get Started for Free