Lindsay Petroleum Company v Hurd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
253 cases
- Central Securities (Holdings) Bhd v Haron bin Mohamed Zaid
- Low Yat Holdings Sdn Bhd and Another; Templeton and Others
- Goh Keng How v Raja Zainal Abidin bin Raja Hussin and Another
-
Fisher v Brooker
...it is an immutable requirement, some sort of detrimental reliance is usually an essential ingredient of laches, in my opinion. In Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874)LR 5 PC 221, 239, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Selborne, giving the opinion of the Board, said that laches applied where "it woul......
Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1965
...(1934) 2 K.B. 394, (1934) All E.R. Rep. 16, 19 30 Liesbosch, Dredger v. S.S. Edison (1933) A C 449 74 Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221, 239. ....................... 16 Lloyd's v. Harper (1880-1) 16 Ch. 290 C.A. ................................................. 30 London ......
-
Preliminary Sections
...(1956) 1 F S C 87 113 Lily Harriet Ram Iswera v. Commissioner of Inland Reve (1965) 1 W.L.R. 663 211 Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221. Long v. Crossley (1879) 13 Ch. D.388 14 Magdalena Securities Ltd.'s Application (1931) 48 P.C. 477. 236 Marian Ashabi Craig v. Victor Em......
-
Table of Cases
...Liman v. Mohammed (1999) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 617) 116…………....………... 4, 10 Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221........................... 246, 397 Linotype Co. Ltd. v. British Empire Typesetting Machine Co. Ltd. (1899) 81 L.T. 331; 15 T.L.R 524………..………………………...........................
-
SOLOMON & ORS. V. MOGAJI
...behaviour." 25 I respectfully adopt the above principle as being the correct statement of the law. In Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221 at 239, Sir Barnes Peacock stated the principles of the defence of laches in these terms: "Now the doctrine of laches in Courts of Equit......
Get Started for Free
