Lindsay Petroleum Company v Hurd
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1865 |
Date | 1865 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
221 cases
- Central Securities (Holdings) Bhd v Haron bin Mohamed Zaid
-
John David Sheffield v John Julian Lionel George Sheffield and Others (1st Defendants) John Julian Lionel George Sheffield (2nd Defendant) John Julian Lionel George Sheffield and Others (3rd Defendants)
...the parties that the applicable principle was that stated by Sir Barnes Peacock delivering the opinion of the Privy Council in Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874) LR 5 PC 221, 239–240 : "Now the doctrine of laches in courts of equity is not an arbitrary or a technical doctrine. Where it woul......
-
Fisher v Brooker
...it is an immutable requirement, some sort of detrimental reliance is usually an essential ingredient of laches, in my opinion. In Lindsay Petroleum Co v Hurd (1874)LR 5 PC 221, 239, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Selborne, giving the opinion of the Board, said that laches applied where "it woul......
- Autocaps (Aust) Pty Ltd v Pro-Kit Pty Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1965
...(1934) 2 K.B. 394, (1934) All E.R. Rep. 16, 19 30 Liesbosch, Dredger v. S.S. Edison (1933) A C 449 74 Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221, 239. ....................... 16 Lloyd's v. Harper (1880-1) 16 Ch. 290 C.A. ................................................. 30 London ......
-
Preliminary Sections
...(1956) 1 F S C 87 113 Lily Harriet Ram Iswera v. Commissioner of Inland Reve (1965) 1 W.L.R. 663 211 Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221. Long v. Crossley (1879) 13 Ch. D.388 14 Magdalena Securities Ltd.'s Application (1931) 48 P.C. 477. 236 Marian Ashabi Craig v. Victor Em......
-
Table of Cases
...Liman v. Mohammed (1999) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 617) 116…………....………... 4, 10 Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221........................... 246, 397 Linotype Co. Ltd. v. British Empire Typesetting Machine Co. Ltd. (1899) 81 L.T. 331; 15 T.L.R 524………..………………………...........................
-
SOLOMON & ORS. V. MOGAJI
...behaviour." 25 I respectfully adopt the above principle as being the correct statement of the law. In Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Hurd (1874) L.R. 5 P.C. 221 at 239, Sir Barnes Peacock stated the principles of the defence of laches in these terms: "Now the doctrine of laches in Courts of Equit......
Request a trial to view additional results