Lister & Company v Stubbs

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1889
Year1889
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
184 cases
  • Faith Panton Property Plan Ltd v Hodgetts
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 Enero 1981
    ...be ignored". Where however a plaintiff is asking for an injunction in proceedings which are pending Lord Justice Cotton in Lister v. Stubbs 45 Ch. D 1 said "I know of no case where, because it was highly probable that if the action were brought to hearing the plaintiff could establish that ......
  • Daraydan Holdings Ltd and Others v Solland International Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 26 Marzo 2004
    ...was ignorant of the commissions and that they specifically did not disclose them to Daraydan. XV Remedies: constructive trust and Lister & Co v Stubbs 75 In Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1 it was alleged by the plaintiffs that their foreman had received secret commissions whic......
  • Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Heiron ( 1880 ) 5 Ex.D. 319 , C.A. and Lister & Co. v. Stubbs ( 1890 ) 45 Ch.D. 1 , C.A. disapproved ... (2) That the Court of Appeal ... 10 Ch.App. 593 the vendors of property to a company gave money forming part of the purchase price to a director of the company to enable him to ... ...
  • FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 Julio 2014
    ...him, not least because it would give the company the right to the money in the event of the agent's bankruptcy. Bowen LJ agreed. 27 Lister was cited with approval by Lindley LJ in In re North Australian Territory Co, Archer's case [1892] 1 Ch 322, 338, and it was followed in relation to a b......
  • Get Started for Free
26 books & journal articles
  • SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December - January 2020
    • 1 Diciembre 2020
    ...638 where Lai Kew Chai J (as he then was) discussed bribes and secret commissions and rejected the decision in Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1 that a proprietary remedy is not available. Affirmed on appeal in Thahir Kartika Ratna v PT Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina......
  • UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 Diciembre 2016
    ...8 See paras 30–56 below. 9 See cases cited in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC[2015] AC 250 at [13]–[17]. 10 (1890) 45 Ch D 1. 11 For the other Court of Appeal decisions which preferred the award of a personal remedy, see Metropolitan Bank v Heiron(1880) 5 Ex D 319; Po......
  • English Influences on the Historical Development of Fiduciary Duties in Scottish Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2014
    • 1 Enero 2014
    ...change from the first edition, though this time the insertion of a reference to a case, the well known decision in Lister v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1, explains the change (though not why it was omitted from the first edition): Gloag, Contract, (n 139) 589. See also G J Bell, Commentaries on t......
  • Asset Preservation Orders - Mareva Injunctions
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 Noviembre 2023
    ...to 15 Mareva Compania Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA, The Mareva (1975), [1980] 1 All ER 213n (CA). 16 Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890), 45 Ch D 1 (CA) [ Lister ]. 17 See Siskina (Cargo Owners) v Distos Compania Naviera SA, The Siskina (1977), [1979] AC 210 (HL) [ The Siskina ]. 18 A......
  • Get Started for Free