Lister & Company v Stubbs

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1889
Year1889
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
180 cases
  • Faith Panton Property Plan Ltd v Hodgetts
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 Enero 1981
    ...should be ignored". Where however a plaintiff is asking for an injunction in proceedings which are pending Lord Justice Cotton in Lister v. Stubbs 45 Ch. D 1 said "I know of no case where, because it was highly probable that if the action were brought to hearing the plaintiff could establis......
  • Daraydan Holdings Ltd and Others v Solland International Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 26 Marzo 2004
    ...to an order that he holds the payments on constructive trust. That question in turn depends on whether the controversial decision in Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1 continues to have any life after the decision of the Privy Council in AG for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] 1 AC 324, and (if ......
  • FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 Julio 2014
    ...him, not least because it would give the company the right to the money in the event of the agent's bankruptcy. Bowen LJ agreed. 27 Lister was cited with approval by Lindley LJ in In re North Australian Territory Co, Archer's case [1892] 1 Ch 322, 338, and it was followed in relation to a b......
  • Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
28 books & journal articles
  • UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 Diciembre 2016
    ...8 See paras 30–56 below. 9 See cases cited in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC[2015] AC 250 at [13]–[17]. 10 (1890) 45 Ch D 1. 11 For the other Court of Appeal decisions which preferred the award of a personal remedy, see Metropolitan Bank v Heiron(1880) 5 Ex D 319; Po......
  • SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 Diciembre 2020
    ...638 where Lai Kew Chai J (as he then was) discussed bribes and secret commissions and rejected the decision in Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1 that a proprietary remedy is not available. Affirmed on appeal in Thahir Kartika Ratna v PT Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina......
  • English Influences on the Historical Development of Fiduciary Duties in Scottish Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , January 2014
    • 1 Enero 2014
    ...change from the first edition, though this time the insertion of a reference to a case, the well known decision in Lister v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1, explains the change (though not why it was omitted from the first edition): Gloag, Contract, (n 139) 589. See also G J Bell, Commentaries on t......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law Society of Upper Canada Special Lectures 2012: Employment Law and the New Workplace in the Social Media Age
    • 18 Junio 2013
    ...64, [1996] OJ No 3819 (Gen Div) ..............................................................................308 Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890), 45 Ch D 1, [1886-90] All ER 797 (CA) .....................344 Lyons v Multari (2000), 50 OR (3d) 526, 3 CCEL (3d) 34, 2000 CanLII 16851 (CA) .............
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT