LJY v Person(s) Unkown

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Neutral Citation[2017] EWHC 3230 (QB)
Year2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
27 cases
  • CWD v Verity Nevitt
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 May 2020
    ...Rights Act 1998 (“the HRA”), the rule in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269 and the observation of Warby J in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 [2018] EMLR 19 at [14] that if the court detected “ cause of action shopping, meaning that if the court concluded that the claimant's true pur......
  • AA v Persons Unknown
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 13 December 2019
    ...privacy applications where injunctive relief is sought to thwart blackmailers, as was noted by Warby J in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB); [2018] EMLR 19, para “Generally, the court has taken the view that blackmail represents the misuse of freedom of speech rights. Such conduct......
  • Hxz v Nmx
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 21 March 2025
    ...injunction under s.12(3) of the Human Rights Act 1998 probably does not apply, see para. 29 of the judgment of Warby J in LJY v Person Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230. Whilst the facts were rather more stark, see also my judgment in Armstrong, at para. 45. If the Claimant must satisfy the higher t......
  • Armstrong Watson LLP v Person(s) Unknown responsible for obtaining data from the Applicant's IT systems on or about 28 February to 6 March 2023 and/or who has disclosed or is intending or threatening to disclose the information thereby obtained
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 31 March 2023
    ...to Dickson at para. 23. Nor is there a public interest in disclosing all or any of the information, see LJY v Person(s) Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB), [2018] EMLR 19, in which Warby J said at paras. 28 to 30: “Blackmail is defined by s.21(1) of the Theft Act 1968: “A person is guilty of bla......
  • Get Started for Free