Lockyer v Gibb

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1966
Date1966

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • Bernal (Brian) and Moore (Christopher) v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • Invalid date
  • Bernal et Al v Reginam
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 26 January 1996
    ...further passage by Lord Wilberforce at p.311 is instructive: “On this same basis, the actual decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in Lockyer v. Gibb [1967] 2 Q.B. 243 was, I think, correct: for there the accused had and knew she had control of the tablets but possibly did not know what ......
  • John Charles v Llewellyn Skeete Supernumerary Constable
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • DPP v Ebbs
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 3 March 2011
    ...v IRELAND & ORS 2006 4 IR 1 MCAULEY & MCCUTCHEON CRIMINAL LIABILITY: A GRAMMER 2000 215 THE QUEEN v HEHIR 1895 2 IR 709 LOCKYER v GIBB 1967 2 QB 243 1966 3 WLR 84 1966 2 AER 653 WARNER v METROPOLITAN POLICE CMSR 1969 2 AC 256 1968 2 WLR 1303 1968 2 AER 356 DRUGS (PREVENTION OF MISUSE) ACT ......
  • Get Started for Free