Lockyer v Gibb

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1966
Year1966
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • Bernal (Brian) and Moore (Christopher) v R
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • Invalid date
  • Bernal et Al v Reginam
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 26 January 1996
    ...further passage by Lord Wilberforce at p.311 is instructive: “On this same basis, the actual decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal in Lockyer v. Gibb [1967] 2 Q.B. 243 was, I think, correct: for there the accused had and knew she had control of the tablets but possibly did not know what ......
  • John Charles v Llewellyn Skeete Supernumerary Constable
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • DPP v Ebbs
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 3 March 2011
    ...v IRELAND & ORS 2006 4 IR 1 MCAULEY & MCCUTCHEON CRIMINAL LIABILITY: A GRAMMER 2000 215 THE QUEEN v HEHIR 1895 2 IR 709 LOCKYER v GIBB 1967 2 QB 243 1966 3 WLR 84 1966 2 AER 653 WARNER v METROPOLITAN POLICE CMSR 1969 2 AC 256 1968 2 WLR 1303 1968 2 AER 356 DRUGS (PREVENTION OF MISUSE) ACT ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The Licensing of Section 1 Firearms and Ammunition
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Firearms Law Handbook - 8th Edition Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...categories of antique firearm, those for which you need a firearm certificate, and those that are free of control. 27 Lockyer v Gibb [1966] 2 All ER 653; Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1968] 2 All ER 356. 28 Sullivan v Earl of Caithness [1976] 1 All ER 844. 29 Woodage v Moss [19......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill The Firearms Law Handbook - 8th Edition Contents
    • 29 August 2019
    ...Police [2001] LLR 495, [2000] Crim LR 853, [2000] All ER (D) 658, DC 117 Liversedge v Whiteoak (1893) 57 JP 692, DC 153 Lockyer v Gibb [1967] 2 QB 243, [1966] 2 All ER 653, [1966] 3 WLR 84, DC 45 Loome v Baily (1860) 3 E & F 444, 25 JP 55, 9 WR 119 151 Lubbock v Chief Constable, Lothian and......