London County Council v Allen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1914 |
| Date | 1914 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
42 cases
-
Regent Oil Company Ltd v J. A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd
...other land to protect, and a covenant dependent upon Tulk v. Moxhay would be good only while that state of things continued; see London County Council v. Allen, (1914 3 King's Bench Division, page 642) cited by the learned judge. I do not think that this reasoning has any application to a c......
-
Sefton v Tophams Ltd
...a purchaser the vendor causes or permits the subsequent activities of the purchaser on the land. In the case of ( L. O. C. v. Allen 1914 3 King's Bench 642) M. J. Allen was in direct breach of his covenants against building in respect of both the plots while he retained the ownership of the......
-
Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Kingswood Motors (Addlestone) Ltd
...(No. 2) (Case 48/72) [1973] C.M.L.R. 287. Brauerei A. Bilger Söhne GmbH v. Jehle (Case 43/69) (1970) 16 Recueil12 7 London County Council v. Allen [1914] 3 K.B. 642, C.A. Torquay Hotel Co. Ltd. v. Cousins [1969] 2 Ch. 106; [1969] 2 W.L.R. 289; [1969] 1 All E.R. 522, C.A. Tulk v. Moxhay (184......
- Chambers v Randall
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
The theory of implied annexation of restrictive covenants revisited
...para.802; Phipson on Evidence, (London, Sweet and Maxwell, 1990), Chap. 37. 156 (1848) 44 E.R. 1143. 157 London County Council v. Allen [1914] 3 K.B. 642; Formby v. Barker [1903] 2 Ch. 539. 158 odgers' Construction of Deeds and Statutes (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1967, 5th edn.), 106. extran......
-
‘For the Record’? Understanding Regulatory Processes through Archival Materials: The Example of Planning Agreements
...economic regeneration,employment or environmental protection.18819 The creation of agreements overcame the defect in LCC v. Allen (1914) 3 K.B. 642,C.A, where the planning authority could not enforce covenants entered into with thelandowner protecting the amenities of the local inhabitants ......
-
§8.3 - Relationship of Burden to Benefit
...the land, but neither can the burden, even if the requirements for running are met on the burden side. London County Council v. Allen, (1914) 3 K.B. 642. This approach likely is related to the English policy against the assignment of easements in American courts have adopted a more liberal ......