London County Council v Allen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1914 |
| Year | 1914 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
37 cases
-
Sefton v Tophams Ltd
...a purchaser the vendor causes or permits the subsequent activities of the purchaser on the land. In the case of ( L. O. C. v. Allen 1914 3 King's Bench 642) M. J. Allen was in direct breach of his covenants against building in respect of both the plots while he retained the ownership of the......
-
Regent Oil Company Ltd v J. A. Gregory (Hatch End) Ltd
...other land to protect, and a covenant dependent upon Tulk v. Moxhay would be good only while that state of things continued; see London County Council v. Allen, (1914 3 King's Bench Division, page 642) cited by the learned judge. I do not think that this reasoning has any application to a c......
-
Jamaica Public Service Company Ltd v Rose Marie Samuels
...mere notice of a restrictive covenant is not enough to impose upon the estate owner an obligation or equity to give effect to it: London County Council v. Allen [1914] 3 K.B. 642.’ (Emphasis supplied) 34 A line of cases, decided after Ashburn Anstalt, was assessed by the English Court of Ap......
-
Jackson way Properties Ltd v Smith and Others
...to preserve the value of other land of his in the neighbourhood.” As is outlined in the headnote, London County Council v Allen & Ors. [1914] 3 K.B. 642 offers clear authority for the proposition that: “An owner of land, deriving title under a person who has entered into a restrictive cove......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Dumpor's Case, 4 Coke 1196, 76 Eng. Rep. 116 (Kings Bench 1603): 17.11(1)(b) London County Council v. Allen, (1914) 3 K.B. 642: 8.3 Spencer's Case, (1583) 77 Eng. Rep. 72 (Q.B.): 8.2 Tulk v. Moxhay, (1848) 41 Eng. Rep. 1143 (Ch.): 8.2,...
-
Enforceability of Land Use Servitudes Benefiting Local Government in Washington
...See Stoebuck, Running Covenants: An Analytical Primer, 52 Wash. L. Rev. 861, 863-65, 906 (1977). 3. See London County Council v. Allen, [1914] 3 K.B. 642 (C.A.) (burdened land transferred to wife of promisor; she built in violation of the promise and the Council had no remedy). 4. Several e......
-
Table of Cases
...All ER 307 4, 7 London Borough of Redbridge v Jaques [1970] 1 WLR 1604, [1971] RTR 56, 69 LGR 228, DC 188 London County Council v Allen [1914] 3 KB 642 245, 263 London Tara Hotel Ltd v Kensington Close Hotel Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1356, [2012] 2 All ER 554, [2012] 1 P & CR 13, [2012] 1 EGL......
-
Restrictive Covenants and Other Restrictions on the Use of Freehold Land in Public Ownership
...area of the LPA with 1 Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310. 2 Tulk v Moxhay (1848) 2 Ph 774; Millbourn v Lyons [1914] 2 Ch 231; LCC v Allen [1914] 3 KB 642. 3 Which replaced Town and Country Planning Act 1971, s 52 (s 106 does not have retrospective effect and applies only to agreements entere......
Request a trial to view additional results