London Lubricants (1920) Ltd's Application ("TRIPCASTROID")
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1925 |
| Date | 1925 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
23 cases
-
Re Fiorelli Trade Mark Applications; Lunan Group Ltd v Edwin Company Ltd
...consumer". The Hearing Officer had in mind, as he made clear in the next paragraph, the observation of Sargant L.J. in London Lubricants Ltd's Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at page 279. 16 As regards aural similarity, after referring to the observation of Sargant L.J., he in fact concluded ......
-
PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd
...105; (2018) 264 FCR 422 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 In the matter of London Lubricants (1920) Limited’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] HCA 43; (2012) 250 CLR 1 Lodestar v Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92; (201......
-
In-N-Out Burgers, Inc v Hashtag Burgers Pty Ltd
...Ltd (2007) 251 FCR 379 Prichard & Constance (Wholesale) Ltd v Amata Ltd (1924) 42 RPC 63 Re London Lubricants (1920) Ltd’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 980; 177 A......
-
Doctor's Associates Inc. v Lim Eng Wah
...(Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [34], citing London Lubricants (1920) Ltd’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at 279). The defendant averred that the marks are dissimilar because the SUBWAY mark consists of two syllables while the offending mark comprises......
Get Started for Free
