London Lubricants (1920) Ltd's Application ("TRIPCASTROID")
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1925 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
48 cases
-
Re Fiorelli Trade Mark Applications; Lunan Group Ltd v Edwin Company Ltd
...Officer had in mind, as he made clear in the next paragraph, the observation of Sargant L.J. in London Lubricants Ltd's Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at page 279. 16 As regards aural similarity, after referring to the observation of Sargant L.J., he in fact concluded that in this case the e......
-
PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd
...105; (2018) 264 FCR 422 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 In the matter of London Lubricants (1920) Limited’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] HCA 43; (2012) 250 CLR 1 Lodestar v Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92; (201......
-
In-N-Out Burgers, Inc v Hashtag Burgers Pty Ltd
...Ltd (2007) 251 FCR 379 Prichard & Constance (Wholesale) Ltd v Amata Ltd (1924) 42 RPC 63 Re London Lubricants (1920) Ltd’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 980; 177 A......
-
Doctor's Associates Inc v Lim Eng Wah (trading as SUBWAY NICHE)
...(Valentino Globe BV v Pacific Rim Industries Inc [2009] 4 SLR(R) 577 at [34], citing London Lubricants (1920) Ltd’s Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at 279). The defendant averred that the marks are dissimilar because the SUBWAY mark consists of two syllables while the offending mark comprises......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Trade Marks: ACTAZIN v ActiPhen ' A tale of two cities or in the ear of the beholder?
...important for the purposes of comparison - this principle is derived from the decision in Re London Lubricants (1920) Ltd's Application (1925) 42 RPC 264 at Interestingly, while all three decisions expressed the view that there is a substantial degree of phonetic similarity between the trad......
3 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Mark by Sandow Limited (1914) R.P.C. 196. 236 In the Matter of London Lubricants (1920) Ltd. Application to register a Trade Mark (1925) 42 R.P.C. 264. 236 Jacker v. International Cable Co. Ltd. [1888] 5 T.L.R. 13. 137 Jackson v. Spittall (1870) L.R. 5 C.P. 542. 297 John Holt Nigeria Ltd. v......
-
The Consumer as the Empirical Measure of Trade Mark Law
...a stage prior to use in the market, when the effect on consumers must be150 Dupas vR(2012) 218 A Crim R 507.151 London Lubricants (1925) 42 RPC 264.152 Pianotist n 119 above.153 Cooper Engineering Co Pty Ltd vSigmund Pumps Ltd (1952) 86 CLR 536.154 Interflora III n 23 above at [162]–[163].15......
-
ALBAN PHARMACY LIMITED V. STERLING PRODUCTS INT. INC
...Ltd.'s Application (1931) 48 P.C. 477. 3. In the Matter of London Lubricants (1920) Ltd. Application to register a 30 Trade Mark (1925) 42 R.P.C. 264. Garrick (with him Tomising) for the Appellants. Somoye for the Respondents. 35 ADEMOLA, C.J.N.: (Delivering the Judgment of the Court): This......