Longman v East; Pontifex v Severn; Mellin v Monico

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1877
Date1877
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Attorney General (Fahy) v Bruen
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • 20 October 1936
    ...R. 582. (2) L. R. 4 C. P. 288. (1) [1931] I. R. 430. (2) 4 App. Cas. 30. (3) 7 Rettie 192. (4) [1912] S. C. 300. (5) 39 T. L. R. 288. (6) 3 C. P. D. 142, at p. 156 perBrett L.J. (7) 30 Ch. D. 231. (8) [1929] I. R. 582. (1) [1927] I. R. 569. (2) [1935] I. R. 908. (3) 16 L. R. Ir. 268. (4) L.......
  • The Queen (Earl of Gosford) v The Irish Land Commission
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 12 February 1898
    ...15 Q. B. 121. In re BaileyENR 3 E. & B. 607. In re HeaphyUNK 22 L. R. Ir. 510. In re SullivanUNK 22 L. R. Ir. 98. Longman v. EastELR 3 C. P. D. 142. Markey v. Lord GosfordDLTR 31 I. L. T. R. 97. Overseers of Walsall v. L. & N. W. Railway Co.ELR 4 App. Cas. 30. Re DawdyELR 15 Q. B. D. 426. R......
  • Pavey v Ministry of Defence
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 November 1998

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT