Lord Chancellor v Coker
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 22 November 2001 |
Neutral Citation | [2001] EWCA Civ 1784,[2001] EWCA Civ 1756 |
Date | 22 November 2001 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Susan Archibald V. Fife Council
...That was inconsistent with the codes of practice on sexual and racial discrimination. Reference was made to Lord Chancellor v Coker [2002] ICR 321 at paras. [54]-[57]. The respondents' existing redeployment policy was not in breach of the requirements of the Act. In affording the appellant ......
-
Hashwani v Jivraj
...have a remedy. We think that that analysis is supported by the obiter observations of this court in paragraph 51 of its judgment in Lord Chancellor v Coker [2002] ICR 321. Conclusion as to the scope of the Regulations in this case 25 For all these reasons we do not think that the Regulatio......
-
Good Law Project Ltd v The Prime Minister
...(3) Authority 70 Both sides rely on the decision of the Court of Appeal in Coker and Osamor v Lord Chancellor [2001] EWCA Civ 1756; [2002] ICR 321 (judgment of the Court given by Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). That case arose under earlier legislation (section 1(1)(b) of the Sex Dis......
- HM Land Registry v Grant
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Achieving social mobility
...fits’. In the context of race, see King v. Great Britain-ChinaCentre (1992) ICR 516 (CA).99. See, for example, Coker v. Lord Chancellor (2002) ICR 321 (CA).100. For example, religion, race, or sexual orientation. See the US case EEOC v. Townley Engi-neering 859 F 2d 610 (ninth Cir. 1988), w......
-
Employee-referral schemes and discrimination law
...States v. Georgia Power 474F 2d 906, at 925–926 (7th Cir 1993) and EEOC v. Chicago Miniature Lamp Works 947 F 2d292 (7th Cir 1991).19. [2002] I.C.R. 321 (CA).20. Ibid, at [57].21. This allows for a person deterred by the provision, criterion or practice: see ExplanatoryNotes, para.79.22. Th......