Loutfi Pasha v Czarnikow (C.)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1952 |
| Date | 1952 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
-
Alrich Development Pte Ltd v Rafiq Jumabhoy (No 2)
... ... Before signing, he asked, `Are you buying for C, or his nominees?` B answered `No`. He was, in fact, buying for nominees ... gave them liberty to recall SL if they thought it necessary: see Loutfi v Czaruikow Ltd ... A re-re-re-re-amended reply was filed by the plaintiffs ... ...
-
Richardson (William) and Dorris Richardson & others v Commissioner of Land Valuation
...39 I will therefore grant this application. In doing so I adopt the word of Sellers J. as he then was, in Loufti v Czarnikow Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 823, at 824. "Not without some doubt looking at the matter which now has to be decided and contemplating that may have to be considered by other ......
- Maybank International (L) Ktd v Desa Tapioca Industries Sdn Bhd
-
Thomas v Crampad International Marketing Company Ltd et Al
...In support he cited Edevain v. Cohen, 43 Ch. D, p. 190, James v. Smith (1891) 1 Ch. D. 384, and Louth v. C. Czarnikow Ltd., [1952] 2 All E.R. 823. The claim for specific performance was not only a new claim but was entirely different in nature and consequences. Accordingly, the amendment a......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Telegraph Limited and ors. (1964) 1 All E.R. 705, 709-710; (1964) 2 Q.B. 601; (1964) 2 W.L.R. 736. 223 Loutfi v. C. Garnikow Ltd. (1952) 2 All E.R. 823. 125 Mancini v. D.P.P. (1942) AC. 1, 11, and 12. 288 Marchant v. Lee Conservancy Board (1974) L.R. 9 Ex. 60 168 Martin v. Martin & Co. (189......
-
IBANGA AND ORS. V. USANGA AND ORS
...659 45 12.Oguntimeyin V. Gubere (1964) 1 All N.L.R. 13.Akinkuowo v. Fafimoju (1965) N.M.L.R. 349. 14.Loufti v. Czarnikow Ltd. (1952) 2 All E.R. 823. 15.Bada v. The Chairman, L.E.D.B. S.C./501/65 of 23rd June, 1967. 16.Attah & Ors. V. Nnacho & Sons (1964) 1 All NLR 312 at 316-7. 50 17. Chief......
-
OGUNTIMEYIN V. GUBERE & ORS
...in controversy at a stage gravely prejudicial to the case for the defence; and his learned counsel cites Loutfi v. C. Czarnikow, Ltd. [1952] 2 All E.R. 823, for his submission that after the evidence has been heard, unless there is strong ground and justification for amendment, there should......
-
RULES FOR GRANTING AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS
...real controversy between the parties". We shall next refer to the following observations of Beller J. in Loutfit v. C. Czarnikow Ltd. (1952) 2 All E.R. 823 at p. 824:- "I should allow that amendment because it is simply setting out in the pleadings that which has emerged in the course of th......