Luc v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 26 March 1996 |
| Date | 26 March 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
45 cases
-
R v Smith (Morgan James)
... ... That history has been further set out in decisions in your Lordships' House in Reg. v. Camplin [1978] A.C. 705 , in Luc Thiet Thuan v. The Queen ... [1997] A.C. 131 and in the present case by my noble and learned friend Lord Hoffmann whose opinion I have had the advantage of reading in draft. I do not repeat that history. I agree with the conclusion of both my noble and learned friends Lord Hoffmann and Lord Clyde that the appeal should be ... ...
-
R v Smith (Morgan James)
...(Court of Appeal). 41 R v Thornton (No 2) (1996) 2 Cr App R 108 (Court of Appeal). 42 R v Morhall (1996) 1 AC (House of Lords). 43 Luc Thiet Thuan v R (1997) 1 AC 131 (Privy Council). 44 R v Campbell (1997) 1 Cr App R 199 (Court of Appeal). 45 R v Parker No 96/5529/Y2 (Court of Appeal......
-
Holley v AG
...by a Single Judge. Authorities Homicide (Jersey) Law, 1986: Article 4. Homicide Act 1957: s.3. R. v Camplin [1978] AC 705 HL(E). Luc Thiet Thuan v R. (1996) 2 All ER 1033; [1997] AC 131 P.C. Ashworth: ‘The Doctrine of Provocation’ [1976] CLJ 292 at 300. R. v Smith (Morgan) [2000] 3 WLR 6......
-
R v Moncrieff
...Aiolfi for the accused. Cases cited: (1) D.P.P. v. Camplin, [1978] A.C. 705; [1978] 2 All E.R. 168, applied. (2) Luc Thiet Thuan v. R., [1997] A.C. 131; [1996] 2 All E.R. 1033, applied. (3) R. v. Acott, [1997] 1 W.L.R. 306; [1997] 1 All E.R. 706, applied. (4) R. v. Byrne, [1960] 2 Q.B. 396;......
Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
-
Descent into Murder: Provocation's Stricture—The Prognosis for Women Who Kill Men Who Abuse Them
...(No. 2) [1996]1 WLR 1174, [1996] 2 All ER 1023, CA, preferred justice over the dictates of logic.Lord Steyn in Luc Thiet Thuan v R [1997] AC 131, [1996] 2 All ER 1033, was ofthe same 17 Attorney-General for Jersey v Holley [2005] UKPC 23, [2005] 2 AC 580 at [66].18 DPP v Camplin [1978] AC 7......
-
The Merits of Ambiguity: Provocation from the Irish Perspective
...cases at the highest level: see Bedderv DPP [1954] 1 WLR 1119; DPP v Camplin [1978] AC 705; R v Morhall [1996] AC 20; Luc Thiet Thuan v R [1997] AC 131; Rv Smith (Morgan) [2001] AC 146 and A-G for Jersey v Holley [2005] UKPC 23, [2005] 2 AC 580.10. See generally B Mitchell, ‘Loss of Control......
-
Court of Appeal
...the accused to be more short-tempered and a mental illnesswhich has that effect. According to the Privy Council in Luc Thiet ThuanvR[1996] 2 All ER 1033, the answer is that the jury should not takeaccount of such characteristics unless the provocation is directed atthem, while the opposite ......
-
Partial reform of partial defences: Developments in England and Wales
...932.4. Ahluwalia [1992] 4 All ER 889, Thornton [1992] 1 All ER 306. For discussion see Nicolson(1995).5. [1978] AC 705.6. [1996] AC 90.7. [1997] AC 131.8. [1995] 4 All ER 1008.9. [1995] 4 All ER 987.10. [2001] 1 AC 146.11. These provisions have been in force since 4 October 2010. The old la......
Get Started for Free
