M v M (Prenuptial Agreement)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2002
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • MacLeod v MacLeod
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 17 December 2008
    ...they have been held relevant to an ancillary relief claim but in rather less positive terms than Edgar. In M v M (Pre-nuptial agreement) [2002] 1 FLR 654, for example, Connell J said this, at para 44: "The pre-nuptial agreement in my view is relevant as tending to guide the court to a more ......
  • N v F
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...EWCA Civ 41, [2011] 1 FCR 242, [2011] 3 WLR 582, [2011] 1 FLR 1723. LKW v DD (FACV 16/2008), HK CFA. M v M (Prenuptial Agreement) [2002] 1 FLR 654. Mallett v Mallett (1984) 156 CLR 605, Aus HC. Martin v Martin [1977] 3 All ER 762, [1978] Fam 12, [1977] 3 WLR 101, CA. McCartney v Mills-McCar......
  • NG v KR (Pre-nuptial Contract)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 28 July 2008
    ...as influential by Wilson J in S v S (Divorce: Staying Proceedings) [1997] 1 WLR 1200, [1997] 2 FLR 100 and by Connell J in M v M (Pre-nuptial Agreement) [2002] 1 FLR 654. (16) Insofar as maintenance for the wife is concerned, if I am wrong in my interpretation of the agreement as above, and......
  • Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 October 2010
    ... [2001] 1 FLR 624 (Johnson J) (where a French ante-nuptial agreement was a significant factor in staying English proceedings); M v M (Prenuptial Agreement) [2002] 1 FLR 654, para 44 ("tending to guide the court to a more modest award than might have been made without it," per Connell J); a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Marriage and Divorce in the Supreme Court and the Law Commission: for Love or Money?
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 74-3, May 2011
    • 1 May 2011
    ...in cases involving the birth of children: KvK (AncillaryRelief:PrenuptialAgreement)[2 003] 1FLR120; MvM (Prenuptial Agreement)[2002] 1 FLR 654. Foreignagreements have also been used,rightlyor wrongly (given the potential implications of Owusu vJa ckson (C- 281/02) [2005]QB 801for the scope ......
  • Case Note: PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS AND FOREIGN MATRIMONIAL AGREEMENTS: TQ V TR1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...Ng Meng Hin[2003] 3 SLR 474. 3 Cap 353, 1997 Ed. 4 Hyman v Hyman [1929] AC 601. 5 See M v M (Financial Provision: Pre-nuptial Agreement)[2002] 1 FLR 654 and K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement)[2003] 1 F L R 120. See also Gareth Miller, “Pre-nuptial Agreements in English law” PCB ......
  • WHEN SPOUSES AGREE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...intervention into the terms and circumstances serves both interests. 1 Hyman v Hyman [1929] AC 601. 2 See M v M (Prenuptial Agreement)[2002] 1 FLR 654 and K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement)[2003] 1 FLR 120. See also Gareth Miller, “Pre-nuptial Agreements in English Law”Private C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT