Maas v Pepper

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Year1905
Date1905

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • HO KING MIN vs LEE MENG LENG
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 6 October 2020
    ...[36] This test was applied by Ong J (later CJ (Malaya) in Michael v Soon Teck Finance Co [1962] MLJ 53 at 56 . [37] In Maas v Pepper [1905] AC 102 , Lord Halsbury LC “It seems to me that the whole of the evidence points in one direction. reality. I do no t think the sale to Mr. Maas was a I......
  • MBF Finance Bhd v Low Ping Ming
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • H Ltd v B
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 9 March 1995
    ...All E.R. Rep. 378. (3) Jelson (Estates) Ltd. v. Harvey, [1983] 1 W.L.R. 1401; [1984] 1 All E.R. 12, considered. (4) Maas v. Pepper, [1905] A.C. 102, considered. (5) Moorcock, TheELR(1884), 14 P.D. 64; [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 530, applied. (6) Mums Inc. v. Cayman Capital Trust Co., Court of ......
  • Ali v Khan
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 July 2002
    ...Contracts 28th Ed. Vol.1 para 12–111. Thus evidence is admissible to show that a written contract for sale was a loan on security, Maas v Pepper [1905] AC 102. Likewise, and of more significance in relation to the facts of this case, extrinsic evidence may be relied on to show that a convey......
  • Get Started for Free