Macintosh v Dun
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1908 |
| Date | 1908 |
| Year | 1908 |
| Court | Privy Council |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
40 cases
- Dale v Veda Advantage Information Services and Solutions Ltd
-
London Association for Protection of Trade v Greenlands Ltd
... ... Macintosh v. Dun [ 1908 ] A. C. 390 distinguished ... Decision of the Court of Appeal [ 1913 ] 3 K. B. 507 reversed ... APPEAL from a decision of the Court of Appeal. F1 ... The facts are fully stated in the judgment of the Lord Chancellor and in the report of the case before the Court ... ...
- Greenlands Ltd v Wilmshurst
-
Neethling v Du Preez and Others; Neethling v the Weekly Mail and Others
...581; Watt v Longsdon [1930] 1 KB 139 (CA) at 147; Beach and Another v Freeson [1971] 2 All ER 854 (CA) at 857, 858, 862; Macintosh v Dun [1908] AC 390 at 399; Perera v Peiris [1949] AC 1 at 19-21; Gerhold v Baker I [1918] WN 368 at 369; Huntley v Ward (1859) 6 CB (NS) 514 at 517; Dunnet v N......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...MacFadden v. Anthony, 117 N.Y.S.2d 520 (Sup. Ct. 1952) ........................................................ .249 Macintosh v. Dun, [1908] A.C. 390 (P.C.) .................................................................................... 289 Mack v. North Hill News Ltd. (1964), 44 D.L.......
-
The Defence of Qualified Privilege
...per Duf J. (Anglin C.J.C., Mignault, and Lamont JJ. concurring). Sapiro v. Leader Publishing Co. Ltd ., above, at 70. Macintosh v. Dun , [1908] A.C. 390 (P.C.) per Lord Macnaghten at 398 and 399, citing Toogood v. Spyring (1834), 1 C.M. & R. 181 at 193 where Parke B. stated: If fairly warra......
-
The Defence of Qualified Privilege
...per Duf J. (Anglin C.J.C., Mignault, and Lamont JJ. concurring). Sapiro v. Leader Publishing Co. Ltd., above, at 70. Macintosh v. Dun, [1908] A.C. 390 (P.C.) per Lord Macnaghten at 398 and 399, citing Toogood v. Spyring (1834), 1 C.M. & R. 181 at 193 where Parke B. stated: If fairly warrant......
-
The cost of losing the code: historical protection of public debate in Australian defamation law.
...(1906) 3 CLR 1134, 1147 (Griffith CJ). In any event, the view of Griffith CJ was overruled by the Privy Council: Macintosh v Dun [1908] AC 390. (38) Michael Gillooly, The Law of Defamation in Australia and New Zealand (Federation Press, 1998) 210 (39) Queensland, Parliamentary Debates, Legi......
Get Started for Free