Mahadervan v Mahadervan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1962
Year1962
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Wicken v Wicken
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...sub nom Re H (minors) (sexual abuse: standard of proof) [1996] AC 563, [1996] 1 All ER 1, [1996] 2 WLR 8. Mahadervan v Mahadervan [1964] P 233, [1962] 3 All ER 1108, [1963] 2 WLR 271. Peete, Re, Peete v Compton [1952] 2 All ER Piers v Piers [1843–60] All ER Rep 159, 9 ER 1118. PetitionThe w......
  • Re Shiu Pak Nin
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 11 February 2014
    ...(13) Lemos v. Coutts & Co. (Cayman) Ltd., 2003 CILR 381; further proceedings, 2004–05 CILR 77, considered. (14) Mahadervan v. Mahadervan, [1964] P. 233; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 271; [1962] 3 All E.R. 1108, applied. (15) Manisty”s Settlement, In re, Manisty v. Manisty, [1974] Ch. 17; [1973] 2 All E.......
  • Chew Pen Hock; Chin Moi and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1976
  • Akhter v Khan (Attorney General intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • Invalid date
    ...according to whether the presumption goes to the question of actual ceremony rather than formalities. In Mahadervan v Mahadervan [1964] P 233 the Divisional Court held that “where a marriage has been followed by long cohabitation and reputation the presumption … may only be rebutted upon ev......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fourth Edition
    • 8 September 2011
    ...H. v. H. , [1953] 2 All E.R. 1229 (void); Parojcic v. Parojcic , [1959] 1 All E.R. 1 at 3 (void); compare Mahadervan v. Mahadervan , [1962] 3 All E.R. 1108 (voidable); A.S. v. A.S. (1988), 65 O.R. (2d) 720 (U.F.C.); Kawaluk v. Kawaluk , [1927] 3 D.L.R. 493 (Sask. K.B.) (voidable); Thompson ......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Third Edition
    • 2 September 2008
    ...H. v. H. , [1953] 2 All E.R. 1229 (void); Parojcic v. Parojcic , [1959] 1 All E.R. 1 at 3 (void); compare Mahadervan v. Mahadervan , [1962] 3 All E.R. 1108 (voidable); A.S. v. A.S. (1988), 65 O.R. (2d) 720 (U.F.C.); Kawaluk v. Kawaluk , [1927] 3 D.L.R. 493 (Sask. K.B.) (voidable); Thompson ......
  • Hans Morgenthau and Republicanism
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Relations No. 24-4, December 2010
    • 1 December 2010
    ...Science Review, 51(3), 1957, p. 714.92 M. I. Finley, ‘Between Slavery and Freedom’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 6(3), 1964, pp. 233–49; C. Wirszubski, Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1......
  • Valuation paradigm: a rationality and (un)certainty spectrum
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Property Investment & Finance No. 35-2, March 2017
    • 6 March 2017
    ...complex or residual (even after every practical feasiblecare has been exercised, there are limitations to reducing uncertainty) (Knight, 1964, p. 233).In dealing with uncertainty, the underlying assumption is bounded rationality, otherwise,it would be impossible to deal with it at all, that......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT