Mahadervan v Mahadervan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1962
Date1962

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Wicken v Wicken
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...sub nom Re H (minors) (sexual abuse: standard of proof) [1996] AC 563, [1996] 1 All ER 1, [1996] 2 WLR 8. Mahadervan v Mahadervan [1964] P 233, [1962] 3 All ER 1108, [1963] 2 WLR 271. Peete, Re, Peete v Compton [1952] 2 All ER Piers v Piers [1843–60] All ER Rep 159, 9 ER 1118. PetitionThe w......
  • Re Shiu Pak Nin
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 11 February 2014
    ...(13) Lemos v. Coutts & Co. (Cayman) Ltd., 2003 CILR 381; further proceedings, 2004–05 CILR 77, considered. (14) Mahadervan v. Mahadervan, [1964] P. 233; [1963] 2 W.L.R. 271; [1962] 3 All E.R. 1108, applied. (15) Manisty”s Settlement, In re, Manisty v. Manisty, [1974] Ch. 17; [1973] 2 All E.......
  • Chew Pen Hock; Chin Moi and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1976
  • Akhter v Khan (Attorney General intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court (EW)
    • Invalid date
    ...according to whether the presumption goes to the question of actual ceremony rather than formalities. In Mahadervan v Mahadervan [1964] P 233 the Divisional Court held that “where a marriage has been followed by long cohabitation and reputation the presumption … may only be rebutted upon ev......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Hans Morgenthau and Republicanism
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Relations No. 24-4, December 2010
    • 1 December 2010
    ...Science Review, 51(3), 1957, p. 714.92 M. I. Finley, ‘Between Slavery and Freedom’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 6(3), 1964, pp. 233–49; C. Wirszubski, Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1......
  • On 'Interests' in Politics
    • United States
    • Sage Politics & Society No. 2-4, September 1972
    • 1 September 1972
    ...Ordinary Language(Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964), p. 49.29. Erikson, Insight and Responsibility (New York: W. W. Norton, 1964), p. 233. at SAGE Publications on December 7, 2012pas.sagepub.comDownloaded from 474interests. Even with further clarification, though, boundary proble......