Mahon v Osborne
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
40 cases
-
Tong Seok May Joanne v Yau Hok Man Gordon
...d/o Muniandy [2002] 1 SLR (R) 1024; [2002] 2 SLR 414 (folld) Lloyde v West Midlands Gas Board [1971] 1 WLR 749 (folld) Mahon v Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14 (distd) Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1999] PIQR P 53 (distd) Reibl v Hughes (1980) 114 DLR (3 d) 1 (distd) Rogers v Whitaker......
-
Lindsay v Mid Western Health Board
...proof and beyond the reach of the plaintiff and a shifting of the onus of proof onto the defendant was justified. Mahon v. OsbourneELR [1939] 2 K.B. 14 and Cassidyv. Minister for HealthELR [1951] 2 K.B. 343 approved. 5. That the effect of applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was that ......
-
Dane Abbott v Sonia Hodge
...of the mishap, unlike the circumstances presented in this case. Scott v London and St. Katherine's Docks Co. (1865) 3 Hurl & C 596 and Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER 535 applied. (3) The respondent was entitled to rely upon any evidence given by any expert at the trial to prove that the ......
- Ang Oon Hue; AV Tucker
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Medical negligence as a causative factor in South African criminal law: Novus actus interveniens or mere misadventure?
...and Tort’ in Lord Denning: The Judge and the Law (1984) 61-3; RM Jackson & JL Powell Professional Negligence (1987) 308; Mahon v Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14; Hatcher v Black [1954] Times, 2 July; Hucks v Cole [1968] Times, 8 May; Whitehouse v Jordan [1981] 1 All ER 267; Ashcraft v Mersey Regiona......
-
Taking stock of res IPSA loquitur: reflections on its applicability to the unsuspecting occupier of premises
...in Canada 30 (Vol. 1) (1989) ;Cassidy v. Ministry of Health [1951] 2 K.B. 343; Fish v. Kapur [1948]2 All E.R. 176; Mohan v. Osborne [1939] 2 K.B. 14. pavement; and where an aircraft has crashed on take off. Of the numerous reported cases in which the doctrine has been applied, it is still i......
-
‘Red in Tooth and Claw’: The Idea of Progress in Medicine and the Common Law
...IN MEDICINE AND LAW 22903Harrington (bc/d) 5/17/02 8:43 AM Page 229 Clark v. MacLennan [1983] 1 All ER 416 (Peter Pain J)Mahon v. Osborne [1939] 2 KB 14 (CA)Anderson v. Chasney [1949] 4 DLR 71 (Manitoba CA)REFERENCESAdorno, Theodor and Max Horkheimer (1944/1997) Dialectic of Enlightenment.L......
Get Started for Free