Mailk v National Bank of Czechoslovakia
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1946 |
| Year | 1946 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran
...the proceedings outside the jurisdiction. In so doing, he relied upon a statement of the law by Goddard L.J. in Malik v. Narodni Banka (1947) 176 L.T. 136, a case also concerned with what is now paragraph (e) of rule 1(1), in which Goddard L.J. (at p. 137) appears to have drawn a distinctio......
-
Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran
...of sufficiency necessary to establish jurisdiction. 743. At p.889 Lord Tucker said, referring to Lord Goddard's judgment in Malik v. National Bank of Czechoslovakia 176 L.T. 136: "As I read Lord Goddard's words, he is saying no more than that before it is 'made sufficiently to appear to th......
-
Vitkovice Horni A Hutni Tezirstvo v Korner
... ... (a company incorporated according to the laws of Czechoslovakia), whose registered office is situate at Moravska Ostrava, in the Republic ... Respondent has deposed that before 1938 he had nominated Rothschilds' bank in London as the place of payment, and I think that he is left at this ... ...
-
Seaconsar Far East Ltd. v. Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, (1993) 159 N.R. 139 (HL)
...16]. Vitkovice Horni a Hutni Tezirstvo v. Korner, [1951] A.C. 869 (H.L.), dist. [para. 17]. Malik v. Narodni Banka, Ceskoslovenska (1947), 176 L.T. 136 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. Spiliada Maritime Corp. v. Cansulex Ltd., [1987] 1 A.C. 460; 71 N.R. 372 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 21]. Société ......
Request a trial to view additional results