Manchester Ship Canal Company v Manchester Racecourse Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1900 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Sefton v Tophams Ltd
...Tophams and Capital have entered into a lawful contract which an injunction against Tophams will bring to an end (see Manchester Ship Canal Co. v. Manchester Racecourse Co. 1901 2 Chancery 37). An injunction therefore should lie but it is agreed that it requires some modification. 25 The se......
-
Aga Khan v Firestone
... ... , THE PRINCIPLE 1889 14 PD 64 MANCHESTER SHIP CANAL CO V MANCHESTER RACECOURSE CO 1909 2 ... J.G. O'Connor and Company Solicitors and Mr. and Mrs. Firestone had used ... ...
-
Pritchard v Briggs
...by the agreement". 47 Turning to English authority there is the extremely important and controversial case of Manchester Ship Canal Company -v- Manchester Racecourse Company, (1900) 2 Chancery 352 at first instance, and (1901)2 Chancery, 37 in. the Court of Appeal and three, or perhaps I sh......
-
Fawcett Properties Ltd v Buckingham County Council
...at all with them, I should be bound to find some meaning and not to declare them void for uncertainty", 67 see Manchester Ship Canal Co. v. Manchester Racecourse Co. [1900] 2 Ch. 352at pages 360–1. Following the guidance of these authorities I should have thought it quite impossible to sugg......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Land Law
...approach which was espoused more than a hundred years ago by Farwell J [in Manchester Ship Canal Company v Manchester Racecourse Company[1900] 2 Ch 352 at 366] and later followed by Walton J in Pritchard v Briggs… 18.26 However, as the basis for the lodgement of the caveat was entirely wron......