Mangin v Inland Revenue Commissioner

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1971
Date1971
Year1971
CourtPrivy Council

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
113 cases
  • Sarawak Shell Bhd and Another v Menteri Kewangan
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • CEC v Comptroller of Income Tax
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 18 June 1971
    ...Privy Council in Desmond Lees Peate v Commissioner of Taxation Commonwealth of Australia [1967] 1 AC 308 and Mangin (Owen Thomas) v IRC [1971] AC 739.If this proposition requires to be spelt out with even greater pungency and clarity I would quote the following from Gunnat p 4196 based on l......
  • Swept Away Resorts Ltd v Commissioner of Taxpayer Appeals
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 30 January 2006
    ...useful to recall some of the rules of interpretation to be applied which were quoted by Lord Donovan in Mangin v Income Tax Commissioner [1971] AC 739 at 746. These are: First, the words are to be given their ordinary meaning. Secondly, one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There ......
  • Ahmad Faisal bin Abdul Karim v Mohd Radzi bin Md Jidin
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2023
  • Get Started for Free