Margaret Thorne que fuit le femme N. Thorne port breve de Dower v Richard
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 332
DEL COMMON-BANK
332 1 ANDERSON, 21. XLII. Margaret Thorne que fuit le ferame N. Thorne port breve de Dower vers Richard Rolfe que plede qne le dit Nicholas Thorne fuit en pleiri vie a Canterbury, & ceo est prist de averr, a que le demandant dit que le dit Nicholas morust a Feveisham, &c. & ceo el eat prist de averr qualitereunq; cur consider. [21] Ideo consideratum est quod dicta. Margareta doceat de morte predict. Nicolai & diet. Ricardus doceat de vita diet. Nicolai & super hoc dies datus est eis, &c. ad quein diem dicta Margareta in probatione mortis diet. Nicolai produxit duos testes queux fuerunt examine & lie parle directment ascun chose de prover le raort le dit Nicholas, mes per arguments queux depositions sont mises en le Record a large & le tenant port nulls proves del vie le dit Nicolas, nee aliter docet tie vita ejus, per quod le Court allow de le proofe fait per le demandant semble d'estre bone, mil proofe esteant fait al contrary, & sur ceo done jugement purle demandant que el recover sa Dower. P. 2. Eliz. Rot. 935.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Djl v Central Authority
...was pronounced. 176 The most significant difference, the appellant submits, between the 1986 and 1995 Regulations was that regs 13, 16(3)(b) and 20(2) of the 1986 Regulations referred to the return of the child to the ‘applicant’ and the later regs 13(1), 16(3)(b) and 20(2) referred to the ......
-
Ellis Don West Indies Ltd Plaintiff v The Urban Development Corporation Defendant [ECSC]
...v. Commercial Union (1985) 2 AER 318. Per Cumming — Bruce LJ at 324 g-h, 325 j, 326 a-b. Boocock v. Hilton International Co. (1993) 4 AER 19 and 20; Per Neil LJ at 29 j-k and per Mann LJ at 30 b-c. 121 Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff relied, as a factor for the court to consider in exerci......
-
Queensland v Stephenson
...the three year limitation period fixed by s 11. Proceedings were instituted on 20 December 2001 by Mr Stephenson, 22 July 2002 by Mr Reeman and 20 December 2001 by Mr Wrightson. The actions were statute-barred unless there was some additional statutory provision for relaxation of that time ......
-
Cable & Wireless (West Indies) Ltd Employer/Appellant v Daima Hill Donald Gardner Lionel George Alston Turner Henzelle Richards Patrick Labadie Blashford Welkins Calvin Edwards Moody Mason Edward Doram Robin Romeo Employees/Respondents [ECSC]
...significance of the fact that this respondent was not at work on 27th February, never reported on the 28th February until 9.20 a.m. (one hour and 20 minutes late) and gave no reason for his late arrival he himself stating that there was no duty on his part to report lateness to his superior......