Marsden (J. L.) v Marsden (A. M.)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1973
Date1973
CourtFamily Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Seepersad v Seepersad
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 29 April 1994
    ...if she is likely to marry. So far as capital assets are concerned, there is no reason for reducing a wife's share. Marsden v. Marsden (1973) 2 All E.R. 851. She has earned it by her contribution in looking after the home and caring for the family. It should not be taken away from her by the......
  • Charles Ernest Leonard Whitlock v Ingeborg Robertson (formerly Whitlock)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 May 1976
    ...to those Rules. He was also referred to three authorities: Jackson v. Jackson 1973, Family Division, 99; Marsden v. Marsden 1973 1 Weekly Law Reports 641 and Doherty v. Doherty 1976 Family Division, 71. He asked himself what he called "the vital question: Has the application been made befor......
  • Hargood (formerly Jenkins) v Jenkins
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...in substance or form. 1 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s. 28 (3): see post, p. 151G. Dryden v. Dryden [1973] Fam. 217 andMarsden (J. L.) v. Marsden (A. M.) [1973] 1 W.L.R. 641 considered. (2) That, accordingly, the court had no jurisdiction to amend the acknowledgment of service to comply wit......
  • H. v H. (Family Provision: Remarriage)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...1122; [1973] 3 All E.R. 1070, C.A. Jackson v. Jackson [1973] Fam. 99; [1973] 2 W.L.R. 735; [1973] 2 All E.R. 395. Marsden (J. L.) v. Marsden (A. M.) [1973] 1 W.L.R. 641; [1973] 2 All E.R. 851. Mesher v. Mesher, The Times, February 13, 1973, C.A. S. v. S., The Times, December 11, 1973. Tripp......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Statute-barred cohabitant claimants in Barbados
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 2-1, June 1992
    • 1 June 1992
    ...that the limitation of reasonableness hedged Matrimonial Causes Act, 1950, s. 19(2) (emphasis supplied). 8 0 Marsden v. Marsden [1973] 2 All E.R. 851 at 851. 81 Ibid. Sir George Baker P. was of the opinion "that the husband was, as it were, keeping the ace of trumps up his sleeve until all ......