Martins v Fowler

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1926
Year1926
Date1926

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • PR v Income Tax Commissioner
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Supreme Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Schildkamp
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 November 1969
    ...regarded as preambles, said he could only use headings to explain doubtful expressions. This case was followed in the Privy Council in Martins v. Fowler [1926] A.C.746 and in The King v. Hare [1934] 1 K.B. 354 and Rex v. Surrey North Eastern Area Assessment Committee [1948] 1 K.B. 28 and......
  • Rex v Mpanza
    • South Africa
    • 19 September 1946
    ...v Tyne Improvement Commissioners (1894, A.C. at 529, 530); Inglis v Robertson and Baxter (1898, A.C. 616 at 624, 630); Martins v Fowler (1926, A.C. 746 at 750, 751); Turffontein Estates Ltd. v Mining Commissioners of Johannesburg (1917 AD 419 at 431); the heading of sec. 5 of the Act may be......
  • Qualter, Hall & Company Ltd v Board of Trade
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 17 July 1961
    ...if possible. 5 Headings of this kind are the equivalent of preambles to older statutes - see the Judgment of the Privy Council in Martina v. Fowler (1926 Appeal Cases at p. 750). This matter was also discussed before Mr Justice Cohen (as he then was) in Re Carlton (1945 Chancery, p. 280) wh......
  • Get Started for Free