Mash & Murrell Ltd v Joseph I. Emanuel Ltd (Ionian.)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Year | 1961 |
| Date | 1961 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
21 cases
-
Henry Kendall & Sons (A Firm) v William Lillico & Sons Ltd and Others
...Liners Ltd. v. Rea Ltd. [1922] 2 A.C. 74 at 92; Cammell Laird & Co. v. Manganese Bronze & Brass Co. [1934] A.C. 402; Mash and Murrell v. Joseph Emanuel Ltd. [1961] 1 W.L.R. at 867 (a sale from one merchant to another). The reliance need not be exclusive. Partial reliance will suffice. The j......
-
Hardwick Game Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Association
...that he relies on the skill and judgment of the seller". 131 Then, after a reference to Mash and Murrell v. Joseph Manuel, (1961) 1 W. L. R. 862, he said: "It seems to me, however, that there are facts in this case which do rebut the presumption. Lillico, Grimsdales, Kendall and Holland Col......
-
Hill (Christopher) Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd (Description)
... ... It will be implied, (see Mash & Murrell Ltd. v. Joseph I Emanual Ltd. [1961] 1 ... ...
-
Teheran-Europe Company Ltd v S T Belton (Tractors) Ltd
... ... upon some observations of my own in the case of Mash & Austin v. Emmanuel , reported in 1961 All England ... ...
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 8: Implied Terms as to Quality and Sample
...Furthermore, the purpose made known to the buyer may make clear what degree of durability is called for. For instance, in Mash & Murrell Ltd v. Joseph I Emanuel Ltd 139 the purpose of the buyer in purchasing a quantity of potatoes then in Cyprus was for them to be “carried by the Ionian on ......
-
Chapter 13: C.I.F. Contracts
...by the case of Mash & Murrell v. Emmanuel [1962] 1 W.L.R. 16 where the Court of Appeal reversed the first instance judgment of Diplock J. ([1961] 1 W.L.R. 862) on this very 208 The only caveat may be in relation to the situation where the goods are shipped, a contract is made for the sale o......
-
Chapter 6: Delivery, Acceptance and Payment
...See further 8–063—8–070. 120 Sale of Goods Act 1979, s. 33. 121 Bull v. Robison (1854) 10 Exch. 342, 346. See also Mash & Murrell Ltd v. Emanuel Ltd [1961] 1 W.L.R. 862. See ss. 11(4), 18 (r. 4), 27, 30(1), 30(2), 30(3), 31(1), 35(1), 35(2), 35(4), 35(6), 35(7), 35A, 36 and 50. 123 For exam......
-
CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
...Ibid 276 (Lord Diplock) (House of Lords). Lord Diplock had expressed a similar view in Mash & Murrell Ltd v Joseph I Emanuel Ltd [1961] 1 WLR 862, 866-7 (Diplock J) (goods under a CIF or C & F contract must remain merchantable for a reasonable time, up to arrival) (later reversed on......
Get Started for Free
