Massey v Heynes
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1888 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
ICICI Bank UK Plc v Mihir Mehta and Others
...(2) The action against Manisha at least is not bound to fail, for the reasons I have explained above. (3) Applying the cited test in Massey v Heynes & Co (1888) 21 QBD 330, the claim against Mona and Manisha as heirs is identical to that against Mihir as an heir and will indeed "involve on......
-
JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v Teck Hock & Co (Pte) Ltd and Others
... ... opinion that the third defendant is clearly a proper party to the action and on this point I would adopt what was said by Lord Esher MR in Massey v Heynes & Co (1888) 21 QBD 330 at p 338: ... The question, whether a person out of the jurisdictions is a `proper party` to an action ... ...
-
Short v Ireland
...d'Alimentacion SA (Case 106/89) [1990] E.C.R. I-4135; [1992] 1 C.M.L.R. 305. Massey v. Heynes (1881) 21 Q.B.D. 338; 57 L.J.Q.B. 468; 59 L.T. 470; 26 W.R. 834. O'Toole v. Ireland [1992] I.L.R.M. 218. Porzelack KG v. Porzelack (UK) Ltd. [1987] 1 W.L.R. 420; [1987] 1 All E.R. 1074. R. v. Secre......
- Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd v The International Tin Council and Another
Request a trial to view additional results