Master against Miller

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtExchequer
Judgment Date05 June 1793
Date05 June 1793

English Reports Citation: 126 E.R. 474

IN THE EXCHEQUER CHAMBER IN ERROR.

Master against Miller

See Davidson v. Cooper, 1844, 13 Mee. & W. 343; Aldous v. Cornwell, 1868, L. R. 3 Q. B. 576; Hirschman v. Budd, 1873, L. R. 8 Ex. 173; Suffell v. Bank of England, 1882, 9 Q. B. D. 560; Bradlaugh v. Newdegate, 1883, 11 Q. B. D. 11; Bradford Corporation v. Ferrand, [1902] 2 Ch. 662.

474 master v. miller sh. Bt.i4t. [141] cases argued and determined in the courts of common pleas, and exchequer chamber, in trinity term, in the thirty-third year or thb eeign ob- george III. master against miller. Wednesday, June 5tb, 1793. [In the Exchequer Chamber in Error.] See the declaration and special verdict at length, 4 Term Rep. B. E. 320. [And see S. C. in error, 1 Anatr. 225.J [See Davidson y. Cooper, 1844, 13 Mee. & W. 343; Aldous v. Cornwdl, 1868, L. E. 3 Q. B. 376; Hirschman v. Budd, 1873, L. E. 8 Ex. 173; Suffell v. Bank of Snaland, 1882, 9 Q. B. D. 560; Bradlaugh v. Newdegate, 1883, 11 Q. B. D. 11; Bradford Corporation v. Ferra-nd, [1902] 2 Ch. 662.] An alteration of the date of a bill of exchange, by which the day of payment would be brought forward, vitiates the bill, and no action can be maintained upon it after such alteration, though in the hands of an innocent indorsee for a valuable consideration (a)1. On behalf of the Plaintiff, Wood argued as follows. It has been contended, on the Other aide, in the Court below, that the acceptor of the bill was discharged from his acceptance by the alteration uf the date, though made without the knowledge of the holder: but no case has been cited to shew, that an alteration, such as was made in tie present instance, would vitiate a written instrument, except it were a deed, But there is & material difference between deeds and bills of exchange. Deeds seldom, if ever, pass through a variety of hands, and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
55 cases
  • Nortje en 'n Ander v Pool, NO
    • South Africa
    • 6 May 1966
    ...Lee & Honore. South African Law of Obligations, bl. 170 e.i.; A John, 'n Oorsig van Onregverdige Verryking as Gedingsoorsaak in die SA Reg, bl. 141. Dit is heeltemal waar dat ons Howe verrykingsaanspreeklikheid in omstandighede erken, wat aan die Romeinse en Romeins-Hollandse reg onbekend w......
  • Gruhn v M Pupkewitz & Sons (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • 30 March 1973
    ...summiere vonnis nie oortuiging op waarskynlikhede nodig is nie, vgl. Eklund v Vorster, 1938 T.P.D. op bl. 258; Roscoe v Stewart, 1937 CPD op bl. 141; Soorju v Pillay, 1962 (3) SA op bl. 908H; Credit Corporation of SA Ltd. v Roy, 1966 (1) SA op bl. 13G; Evelyn Haddon & Co. Ltd. v Leojanko (P......
  • Botha v Minister van Veiligheid en Sekuriteit
    • South Africa
    • 3 December 2002
    ...betrekking op: A 'Arrest and treatment of an arrested person until such person is handed over to the Community Service Centre Commander'. Op bl 141 verskyn die volgende para 'The object of an arrest; general rule: As a general rule the object of an arrest is to secure the attendance of such......
  • Botha v Minister van Veiligheid en Sekuriteit
    • South Africa
    • 3 December 2002
    ...of an arrested person until such person is handed over to the Community Service Centre Commander.' J 2003 (6) SA p575 Kirk-Cohen R Op bl 141 verskyn die volgende para 4(1): A 'The object of an arrest; general rule: As a general rule the object of an arrest is to secure the attendance of suc......
  • Get Started for Free