Mather v Mahoney

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1968
Year1968
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Perrini v Perrini
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Kd (Otherwise C) v Mc
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1987
    ...2 W.L.R. 969. Peters v. Peters [1968] P. 275; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1235; [1967] 2 All E.R. 318. Mather v. Mahoney [1968] 3 All E.R. 233; [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1773. Olympia Productions v. Olympia Theatre (Unreported, Supreme Court, 31st June, 1979). In re J.H. (inf:) [1985] I.R. 375; [1985] I.L.R.M. 3......
  • Edward v. Edward Estate and Skolrood, (1987) 57 Sask.R. 67 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 15 June 1987
    ...Hornett v. Hornett, [1971] P. 255, refd to. [para. 22]. Angelo v. Angelo, [1968] 1 W.L.R. 401, refd to. [para. 22]. Mather v. Mahoney, [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1773, refd to. [para. Rowland v. Rowland (1973), 42 D.L.R.(3d) 205 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 23]. Bevington v. Hewitson (1974), 4 O.R.(2d......
7 books & journal articles
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...[1969] P 119; Asghar v Doyle, 2014 NBQB 254; Martinez v Basail, 2010 ONSC 2038; Essa v Mekawi, 2014 ONSC 7409. Mather v Mahoney, [1968] 3 All ER 223. This criterion has been deemed applicable even though the foreign divorce was granted prior to that ruling: Edward v Edward Estate (1987), 8 ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 September 2010
    ...447 Martodam v. Martodam, [2007] A.J. No. 179, 2007 ABQB 100 ......................... 443 Mather v. Mahoney, [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1773 (P.D.A.) ............................................ 414 Matrix Integrated Solutions Ltd. v. Naccarato (2009), 97 O.R. (3d) 693, 75 C.P.C. (6th) 17, [2009] O.J......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Fifth Edition
    • 29 August 2013
    ...Indyka v Indyka , [1969] 1 AC 33 (HL); Mayfield v Mayfield , [1969] P 119; Martinez v Basail , 2010 ONSC 2038. 94 Mather v Mahoney , [1968] 3 All ER 223. This criterion has been deemed applicable even though the foreign divorce was granted prior to that ruling: Edward v Edward Estate (1987)......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Sixth Edition
    • 29 August 2015
    ...P 119; Asghar v Doyle , 2014 NBQB 254; Martinez v Basail , 2010 ONSC 2038; Essa v Mekawi , 2014 ONSC 7409. 93 Mather v Mahoney , [1968] 3 All ER 223. This criterion has been deemed applicable even though the foreign divorce was granted prior to that ruling: Edward v Edward Estate (1987), 8 ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT