MATTHEW McFADDEN ANDREW SPARK Appellants against HM ADVOCATE
Jurisdiction | Scotland |
Neutral Citation | 2009 SCCR 902 |
Date | 2009 |
Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Meighan v HM Advocate
...SCL 153; 2009 GWD 33-559 Lundy v R [2013] UKPC 28; [2014] 2 NZLR 273; The Times, 10 December 2013 McFadden v HM Advocate [2009] HCJAC 78; 2009 SCCR 902; 2010 SCL 247 McGinty v HM Advocate [2006] HCJAC 8; 2006 GWD 11-202 McIntyre v HM Advocate [2005] HCJAC 50; 2005 SLT 757; 2005 SCCR 380 Mil......
-
The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v Crowe
...REGS 1997 SI 74/1997 REG 17 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1984 S7(3) THOMAS v JONES 1921 1 KB 22 1920 AER REP 462 MCFADDEN & SPARK v HM ADVOCATE 2009 SCCR 902 2009 HCJAC 78 Crime & sentencing – Communications – Sending menacing message – Message sent to Garda –Appeal against conviction and sentence ......
-
Opinion Of The Court Delivered By Lady Paton In The Cause William Lauchlan And Charles O'neill Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...appellant (i) Section 118(8) [26] The advocate depute referred to section 118(8) of the 1995 Act and to McFadden and Spark v HM Advocate 2009 SCCR 902 paragraphs [20]-[21]. No objection had been taken to the judge’s question at the trial. It was not now open to the appellants to argue that ......
-
Note Of Appeal Against Conviction By Scott Leslie Snowden And Robert Michael Jennings Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...they were of no probative value. The statements could have been proved without reference to the name “Rab” (McFadden v HM Advocate 2009 SCCR 902). The statements were “highly prejudicial” to the appellant. This prejudice could not have been cured by the trial judge’s directions. Notwithstan......
Request a trial to view additional results