Mauroux v Soc. Com. Abel Pereira da Fonseca S.A.R.L.
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1972 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Ridehalgh v Horsefield; Watson v Watson (Wasted Costs Orders)
...orders against solicitors did come before the courts. Edwards v Edwards [1958] P. 235, Wilkinson v Wilkinson [1963] P.1, Mauroux v Soc.Com. Abel Pereira da Fonseca SARL [1972] 1 WLR 962, Currie & Co v The Law Society [1977] QB 990 and R & T Thew Ltd v Reeves (No2) (Note) [1982] QB 1283 are......
- G.A.F. Corporation v Amchem Products Inc.
-
Marchand v. Public General Hospital Society of Chatham et al., (1998) 51 O.T.C. 321 (GD)
...the costs of the other side because of his 'oppressive procedure') and Mauroux v. Sociedade Comercial Abel Pereira da Fonseca SARL , [1972] 2 All E.R. 1085; [1972] 1 W.L.R. 962 (holding the solicitor not liable for an 'oversight')." [64] Historically, the courts' jurisdiction to award costs......
-
Davy-Chiesman v Davy-Chiesman
...can be taken in litigation by a party who is legally aided against one who is not. This is particularly so in matrimonial causes. 28 In Mauroux v. Pereira (1972) 1 Weekly Law Reports 963 a similar application under the principles set out in Myers v. Elman and order 62, rule 8, was made to M......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
LETTERS OF CREDIT: A CONFLICT OF LAWS PERSPECTIVE
...Law Review and Butterworths, Singapore 1985. 54 Schmitthoff, op. cit,. note 48 at p. 155. 55 Supra, note 50; see also Maroux v. Pereira[1972] 1 W.L.R. 962. 56 Op. Cit., note 48 at pp. 155—156 57 Art. 6 U.C.P.. 58 PerDiplock J., Ian Stach Ltd. v. Baker Bosley Ltd[1958] 2 Q.B. 130, 139. 59 Be......