Mawaz Khan v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1966 |
| Date | 1966 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
54 cases
-
Bernal et Al v Reginam
...juice as part of a concoction “for the purpose of escaping the consequences of their crime”: Lord Hudson Mawaz Khan v. Reginam [1967] 1 All E.R. 80 at 83. Furthermore, they switched the cases of pineapple juice by replacing them with compressed ganja in cans labelled Grace pineapple juice. ......
- Bernal (Brian) and Moore (Christopher) v R
-
Massinissa Adams and Others v R
...it was given in circumstances in which its reliability was not affected. Relying on Subramaniam v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR 965, Mawaz Khan v R [1967] 1 AC 454 and R v Binham [1991] Crim LR 774 and Ajodha v R [1982] AC 204, she submitted that this being an exculpatory statement, it is ......
-
R. v. Pritchard (D.M.), 2007 BCCA 82
...S.C.R. 709, refd to. [para. 46]. R. v. Jones (1971), 3 C.C.C.(2d) 153 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 46]. Kahn (Mawaz) et al. v. R., [1966] 3 W.L.R. 1275 (P.C.), refd to. [para. People v. Russell (1934), 266 N.Y. 147, refd to. [para. 47]. R. v. Mahoney (1979), 50 C.C.C.(2d) 380 (Ont. C.A.), a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Hearsay, Confessions and Mobile Telephones
...that heis relying on second-hand information.17 [2011] EWCA Crim 1143, [2011] 2 Cr App R 17 at [18].18 See, e.g., Mawaz Khan v The Queen [1967] 1 AC 454 in which the two defendantseach produced the same demonstrably false alibi when first questioned about amurder. This was not hearsay or a......