Mayor, Company of New Windsor and Another v Taylor
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 28 November 1898 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1898] UKHL J1128-2 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 28 November 1898 |
[1898] UKHL J1128-2
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants, as well on Friday last as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses of the borough of New Windsor, in the county of Berks, and Henry Husted, of High Street, Eton, in the county of Bucks, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 8th of November, 1897, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed case of Joseph Taylor, lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and Counsel appearing for the said Respondent, but not being called on: and due consideration being had of what was offered for the said Appellants:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 8th of November, 1897, complained of in the said Appeal be, and the same is hereby, Affirmed, and that the said Petition and Appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed this House; And it is further Ordered, That the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The Waterford Bridge Commissioners v Corporation of Waterford and The Attorney-General
...R. 2 Eq. 123. (5) 27 L. R. Ir. 464. (1) 7 Ir. C. L. R. 27. (1) In the Court of Appeal, before FitzGibbon, Walker, and Holmes, L.JJ. (2) [1899] A. C. 41. (3) 1 B. & S. 916, (4) 2 Q. B. D. 224. (1) [1903] A. C. 355. (2) 7 Ir. C. L. R. 27. (3) 8 Ir. L. R. 43. (4) L. R. 6 Q. B. 422. (5) 2 Q. B.......
-
Simmonds and Another v Ennis Town Council (No 2)
...Ó CAOIMH 22.2.2002 2002/26/6698 SIMMONDS v KILKENNY CO BOROUGH & ORS UNREP SUPREME 8.6.2011 2011 IESC 20 NEW WINDSOR CORPORATION v TAYLOR 1899 1 AC 41 IRISH TRUST BANK LTD v CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND 1976-7 ILRM 50 WORLDPORT IRELAND LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v COMPANIES ACTS UNREP CLARKE 16.6.2005......
-
S.M. v Ireland (No 2)
...OF ENGLAND 4ED PARA 623 CONVEYANCING & LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1884 (UK) MANCHESTER MARKETS ACT 1846 (UK) MAYOR OF NEW WINDSOR & ANOR v TAYLOR 1899 AC 41 LOCAL ACT 9 GEO 2 C.XV 1734 (UK) LOCAL ACT 59 GEO 3 C.CXXVI 1819 (UK) HALSBURY'S LAWS OF ENGLAND 3ED PARA 308 COUSINS PEASE & CHITTY'S LAW OF......
-
Table of Cases
...ER 1166 5.5, 8.1, 22.7 New Windsor Corporation v Mellor [1975] Ch 380, [1975] 3 All ER 44, 73 LGR 337 4.2 New Windsor Corporation v Taylor [1899] AC 41, 15 TLR 67, HL 4.9 Newbury District Council v Russell (1997) 95 LGR 705, ChD 6.6 Newcastle (Duke of) v Worksop Urban District Council [1902......
-
Custom and Variety
...House of Lords in Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council 72 69 (1875–76) LR 1 App Cas 513. 70 New Windsor Corporation v Taylor [1899] AC 41; Wyld v Silver [1963] 1 QB 169, although either of those cases may have involved a franchise. 71 In re Turnworth Down, Dorset [1978] Ch 251; ......