McDonald's Hamburgers Ltd v Burger King (UK) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
Year1987
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 cases
  • Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 April 2007
    ...Silver Concept Sdn Bhd [2005] 5 MLJ 1 (refd) Mayson v Clouet [1924] AC 980 (refd) McDonald's Hamburgers Limited v Burgerking (UK) Limited [1987] FSR 112 (folld) Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd v Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd [2001] 1 SLR (R) 614; [2001] 2 SLR 443 (refd) Pam......
  • Ho Soo Fong and Another v Standard Chartered Bank and Other Applications
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 18 November 2004
    ...inappropriate, as the claim for damages would not succeed. Counsel referred me to McDonald’s Hamburgers Limited v Burgerking (UK) Limited [1987] FSR 112, a decision of the English Court of Appeal, which was followed in Fraser & Neave Ltd v Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd [1988] SLR 96, for the propositio......
  • Fraser & Neave Ltd v Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 16 November 1988
    ...party to pursue it. The inquiry would of course be at that party`s risk as to costs (see McDonald`s Hamburgers Ltd v Bugerking (UK) Ltd [1987] 1 FSR 112, a decision of the English Court of Appeal).The onus of proof lies on the party who asserts that it has sustained damage, and it must be p......
  • Pasterfield v Denham and another
    • United Kingdom
    • County Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Inquiries as to damages in South African intellectual property law
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...UK Ltd v Edenwest Ltd [1994] RPC 279 at 280. 12 Sanitas Company Limited v Condy (1887) 4 RPC 530 at 533. 13 (1915) 32 RPC 273 at 289. 14 [1987] FSR 112. 15 At 118. 16 At 120. Wadlow op cit note 4 at 580-581 confirms this view: 'discovery in the action does not cover quantum of damage, and t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT