McDonald's Hamburgers Ltd v Burger King (UK) Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1987 |
Year | 1987 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor
...Silver Concept Sdn Bhd [2005] 5 MLJ 1 (refd) Mayson v Clouet [1924] AC 980 (refd) McDonald's Hamburgers Limited v Burgerking (UK) Limited [1987] FSR 112 (folld) Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd v Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd [2001] 1 SLR (R) 614; [2001] 2 SLR 443 (refd) Pam......
-
Ho Soo Fong and Another v Standard Chartered Bank and Other Applications
...inappropriate, as the claim for damages would not succeed. Counsel referred me to McDonald’s Hamburgers Limited v Burgerking (UK) Limited [1987] FSR 112, a decision of the English Court of Appeal, which was followed in Fraser & Neave Ltd v Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd [1988] SLR 96, for the propositio......
-
Fraser & Neave Ltd v Yeo Hiap Seng Ltd
...party to pursue it. The inquiry would of course be at that party`s risk as to costs (see McDonald`s Hamburgers Ltd v Bugerking (UK) Ltd [1987] 1 FSR 112, a decision of the English Court of Appeal).The onus of proof lies on the party who asserts that it has sustained damage, and it must be p......
- Pasterfield v Denham and another
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Inquiries as to damages in South African intellectual property law
...UK Ltd v Edenwest Ltd [1994] RPC 279 at 280. 12 Sanitas Company Limited v Condy (1887) 4 RPC 530 at 533. 13 (1915) 32 RPC 273 at 289. 14 [1987] FSR 112. 15 At 118. 16 At 120. Wadlow op cit note 4 at 580-581 confirms this view: 'discovery in the action does not cover quantum of damage, and t......