McEntire and Maconchy v Crossley Brothers, Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 13 May 1895 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1895] UKHL J0513-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 13 May 1895 |
McEntire and Maconchy
and
Crossley Brothers, Limited.
[1895] UKHL J0513-1
House of Lords
1
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants, as well on Friday last as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of Alexander Knox McEntire and John Arthur Maconchy, the Official Assignees of the Court of Bankruptcy in Ireland, being the Assignees of the estate and effects of Thomas Frederick Peel, of No. 6, Cathedral Place, Limerick, a Bankrupt, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
30 cases
-
Governor and Company of The Bank of Ireland v Eteams International Ltd
...In doing that I would in a case such as the present apply the law as stated by Lord Herschell in McEntire v Crossley Bros Ltd [1895] AC 457 at 462–463, [1895–9] All ER Rep 829 at 831 where he said: ‘… I quite concede that the agreement must be regarded as a whole—its substance must be look......
-
Re Bond Worth Ltd
... ... 257 ; [ 1971 ] 1 All E.R. 766 ... McEntire v. Crossley Brothers Ltd. [ 1895 ] A.C. 457 , H.L.(I.) ... ...
-
Belmont Park Investments Pty Ltd and Others v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and another (HM Revenue and Customs and another intervening)
... ... BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 38 ... ...
-
Sova Capital
...of a matter it is normally concerned with its legal substance, not its economic substance (if different). They relied on McEntire v Crossley Brothers [1895] AC 457, 462; Lloyds & Scottish Finance Ltd v Cyril Lord Carpets Sales Ltd [1992] BCLC 609, 614h–615b and Re Polly Peck International [......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
IFI Update London, August/October 2008 - Part 2
...applied the principles established in English cases such as Alderson v. White (1858) 2 De G & J 97, McEntire v. Crossley Bros Ltd [1895] AC 457, Helby Matthews [1895] AC 471 and Re George Inglefield Ltd [1933] 1 Ch 1, and the Privy Council decision in Chow Yoong Hong v. Choong Fah Rubbe......
2 books & journal articles
-
THE CASE AGAINST THE EQUITABLE LIEN.
...As Lord Herschell LC remarked, 'a man does not have a lien on his own property or a charge either': McEntire v Crossley Brothers Ltd [1895] AC 457, (98) It should be noted that Calnan is sceptical about the need for the vendor's lien: see Calnan (n 14) 151 [4.182]. (99) See Tanwar Entperpri......
-
A PPSA registration primer.
...and Personal Property under the Laws of Australian Jurisdictions (Lawbook, 5th ed, 1993) 527-56. (18) McEntire v CrossleT Brothers Ltd [1895] AC 457. The Security Interests in Goods Act 2005 (NSW) applied to a security instrument by or under which a security interest was reserved or created......