McFarlane v E.E. Caledonia Ltd (No. 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1995
Date1995

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
39 cases
  • Condliffe v Hislop and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 October 1995
    ...have been correct on its facts, but in my view it is of no assistance to the defendant in the present case. 58 In McFarlane v E.E. Caledonia Ltd (No 2) (1995) 1 WLR 366 Longmore J. at the request of successful defendants ordered that costs be paid by a commercial organisation which had fund......
  • Hamilton v Al-Fayed (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 May 2002
    ...would have given the organisation 12.5 percent of the plaintiff's damages. Having referred to Hill v Archbold [1968] 1 QB 686 he said [1995] 1 WLR 366, 373: 'It may well be that it is not necessary to every case of lawful maintenance that the maintainer should accept a liability for a succ......
  • Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others (Nos 2 and 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 May 2005
    ...provided always that the one who supports the litigation, if it fails, pays the costs of the other side." 26 In McFarlane v EE Caledonia Ltd (No 2) [1995] 1 WLR 366 the conduct of a Scottish company was in issue. It had been formed to support personal injury claims on a contingency basis an......
  • Lyubov Andreevna Kireeva (as Trustee and Bankruptcy Manager of Georgy Ivanovich Bedzhamov) v Alina Zolotova
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 13 March 2024
    ...Although a champertous funding arrangement is unenforceable as between the parties to the agreement, (see for example, McFarlane v EE Caledonia Ltd (No.2) [1995] 1 WLR 366, and Dal-Sterling Group v WSP South & West [2001] 7 WLUK 436 TCC at [20]) the fact of established maintenance or ch......
  • Get Started for Free