McGovern v Attorney General

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1981
Date1981
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Re Koeppler Will Trusts
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Radio Authority, ex parte Bull
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 17, 1997
    ...consider the meaning of "political" in some detail. I agree with them and Mr Pannick that the judgment of Slade J. in McGovern v A.- G. [1982] Ch 321 provides assistance. Slade J. was concerned with the question whether a trust of Amnesty International was entitled to charitable status. He ......
  • Colgan v IRTC
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • January 1, 1999
    ...AC 931 MURPHY V INDEPENDENT RADIO & TELEVISION COMMISSION 1997 2 ILRM 467 R V RADIO AUTHORITY EX-PARTE BULL 1995 3 WLR 572 MCGOVERN V AG 1982 CH 321 RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S9(1)(v) RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S10(6) EAST DONEGAL CO-OP V AG 1970 IR 317 1 JUDGMENT of O’Sullivan ......
  • Hanchett-Stamford v Attorney General and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • February 27, 2008
    ...constitutional responsibility it is to evaluate the need for such changes. This was one of the reasons given by Slade J in McGovern v A-G [1982] Ch 321 and by Chadwick LJ in ( Southwood v A-G 28 June 2000). This last reason seems to me to be the most persuasive. But whatever the rationale, ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Perspectives on Animals and the Law Part V. New Tactical Approaches
    • June 19, 2015
    ...v Steel, [1997] EWHC QB 366 ............................................... 58 McGovern et al v A-G (1981), [1982] 1 Ch 321, [1981] 3 All ER 493 ......................................................................................244, 268, 269 McHale v Ontario (AG), 2010 ONCA 36 ................
  • A CHARITY IN ALL BUT LAW: THE POLITICAL PURPOSE EXCEPTION AND THE CHARITABLE SECTOR.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, January 2019
    • January 1, 2019
    ...Law Review 871, 871-2, 875-6 ('Distinguishing Charity and Politics'). (2) Re Green's Will Trusts [1985] 3 All ER 455. (3) McGovern v A-G [1982] 1 Ch 321 ('McGovern'). (4) Juliet Chevalier-Watts, Law of Charity (Thomson Reuters, 2014) 5-6. (5) Statute of Charitable Uses 1601, 43 Eliz 1, c 4 ......
  • ‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 66-2, March 2003
    • March 1, 2003
    ...The Independent 20 June 1995.31 n 29 above, 306. In this he drew support from the judgement of Slade J in McGovern vAttorneyGeneral [1982] Ch 321 340.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 66228 rThe Modern Law Review Limited oriented to a public audience.32Thus, as they stand, the restrictions in the......
  • Foundations of Charity Law in the New Welfare State
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-3, May 1999
    • May 1, 1999
    ...1992) 147; Marilyn Taylor, ‘The Canary in the Coalmine:Issues Facing the Voluntary Sector’ (1996) 8 Social Policy Review 40.60 [1982] Ch 321.61 It is gener ally assumed that opposing changes in the law is also ‘political’ and therefore non-charitable:see Re Hopkinson [1949] 1 All ER 346, 35......
  • Get Started for Free