Mclaughlin v Solloway & Mills et Al
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1937 |
| Year | 1937 |
| Date | 1937 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
46 cases
- YK Fung Securities Sdn Bhd v James Capel (Far East) Ltd
-
Grace v Sheehan & Hall
...AND HUGH HALL AND BARBARA HALL RESPONDENTS STOCK EXCHANGE ACT 1995 S30(1) STOCK EXCHANGE ACT 1995 S30(8) SOLLOWAY & ANOR v MCLAUGHLIN 1938 AC 247 BBMM FINANCE (HONG KONG) LTD v EDA HOLDINGS LTD & ORS 1990 1 WLR 409 1991 2 AER 129 SACHS v MIKLOS & ORS 1948 2 KB 23 1948 1 AER 67 SHANAHANS STA......
-
BBMB Finance (Hong Kong) Ltd v Eda Holdings Ltd
...of damages was the value thus lost. To depart from that rule in the present case would be inconsistent withSolloway v McLaughlinELR ((1938) AC 247. Their Lordships did not consider that the decision in that case could be affected by the Brandeis case or by the Torts (Interference with Goods......
-
Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd and HSBC Securities Services (Luxembourg) Sa
...v. South Wales Switchgear Co. Ltd., [1978] 1 W.L.R. 165; [1978] 1 All E.R. 18; (1977), 8 BLR 1, referred to. (77)Solloway v. McLaughlin, [1938] A.C. 247, distinguished. (78)Spread Trustee Co. Ltd. v. Hutcheson, [2011] UKPC 13; [2012] 2 A.C. 194; 2011–12 GLR 164; [2012] 2 W.L.R. 1360; [2012]......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Grand Court Clarifies The Ordinary Rule For Damages In Temporary Deprivation Of Property Cases
...3. In making this determination, the Court regarded as binding or highly persuasive the Privy Council decision of Solloway v McLaughlin [1938] AC 247, and declined to follow the English Court of Appeal decision of Brandeis Goldschmidt & Co Limited v Western Transport Limited [1981] QB The c......
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...(SCJ) ...................... 255 Solloway v McLaughlin (sub nom McLaughlin v Solloway) (1937), [1937] 4 DLR 593, [1937] 4 All ER 238, [1938] AC 247 (PC) ..................... 301 Somerville v Ashcroft Development Inc, [2005] OTC No 701, 35 RPR (4th) 102, [2005] OJ 3361 (SCJ) .....................
-
Awards Measured by Benefit: Restitution
...ER 51; Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890), 45 Ch D 1 (CA); Williams v Barton , [1927] 2 Ch 9. 95 See, for example, Solloway v McLaughlin (1937), [1938] AC 247, [1937] 4 DLR 593 (PC); Zwicker v Stanbury , [1953] 2 SCR 438. 96 See Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc , 2007 SCC 24. For instance, courts hav......
-
Awards Measured by Benefit: Restitution
...& Co. v. Stubbs (1890), 45 Ch. D. 1 (C.A.); Williams v. Barton , [1927] 2 Ch. 9. 86 See, for example, Solloway v. McLaughlin (1937), [1938] A.C. 247, [1937] 4 D.L.R. 593 (P.C.); and Zwicker v. Stanbury, [1953] 2 S.C.R. 438. 87 See, for example, Canadian Aero , above note 70. 88 See, for exa......
-
Flexibility of Damages for Conversion and Detinue
...analysis in some of the relevant cases. A good example is the Privy Council decision in Solloway v McLaughlin.3636Solloway v McLaughlin [1938] A.C. 247 (PC). There, a dishonest stock broker unlawfully sold (or converted) the shares of his client (the claimant) when the market price for the ......