McNally v Saunders

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Neutral Citation[2021] EWHC 2012 (QB)
Year2021

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Sayed Zulfikar Abbas Bukhari v Syed Tauqeer Bukhari
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 1 March 2023
    ...(QB). In pleading a claim for harassment by publication, it will be essential to have that test in mind. See also McNally v Saunders [2021] EWHC 2012 (QB); [2022] EMLR 3, where the defendant was a ‘citizen journalist’ whose art.10 rights protected his postings from liability in harassment e......
  • Richard Phillips v Stefan Oloffs
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 17 July 2026
    ...the process as a “holistic and evaluative exercise, to be undertaken in as full a context as possible”. 80 However, as McNally v Saunders [2021] EWHC 2012 (QB), [2022] EMLR 3 illustrates, it is possible to determine gravity at an early stage, especially in a case such as this which largely ......
  • Deborah Hicks v Director of Public Prosecutions
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 9 May 2023
    ...1986 Act does not impose an obligation to be adopt a tone that is polite or quiet or respectful: see by analogy McNally v Saunders [2021] EWHC 2012 (QB), [2022] EMLR 3, [76]–[78], and the case law referred to there. I bear in mind also that Ms Brown said at one point that Ms Hicks was “not ......
  • Matthew Cavan and Jolene Bunting
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • 19 December 2025
    ...available social media blocking functions to minimise further exposure. [35] The third authority of assistance was McNally v Saunders [2021] EWHC 2012 (QB). Like Thomas, it concerned an application to strike out a claim for harassment arising out of a blog posted by the defendant on a Faceb......
  • Get Started for Free