Mesure against Britten
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 12 February 1796 |
| Date | 12 February 1796 |
English Reports Citation: 126 E.R. 736
IN THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER CHAMBER
Mesure against Britten
mesure against britten. Friday, Feb. 12th, 1796. Though a rule to plead expires on a dies non juridicus, ex gr. the Purification, the Defendant is bound to plead on or before that day, and if he does not, judgment may be signed on the next day. Le Blanc, Serjt., shewed cause against a rule to set aside a judgment signed for want of a plea, on the following circumstances :-The rule to plead was given on the 30th of January, which expired on the 2d of February being a four day rale, and both the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
17 cases
-
Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Suid-Afrika Bpk v Lemmer
...beoog het nie. Kyk Steyn, op. cit. bl. 114 - 5; Hatch v Koopoomal, 1936 AD 190 te bl. 208; Ex parte Fourie en Andere, 1962 (3) SA 614 te bl. 616. Indien die bepalings slegs aanwysend is, is wesentlike voldoening aan die vereistes van die mediese verslag genoegsaam. Kyk Administrator, B Tran......
-
Smit v Saipem
...Privaatrecht, art. 204, B 3de druk, bl. 340 - 342; Max Kaser, Das Römische Privatrecht, Erster Abschnitt, art. 143 II 2 (b), 2de uitg., bl. 616 - 7; De Zulueta, Commentary on the Institutes of Gaius, bl. 206 - 7). Jolowicz (ad D.47.2.: De Furtis, bl. xxix) wys op die "It is thus possible to......
-
Geyser en 'n Ander v Pont
...'n leser met normale verstand, ontwikkeling en gevoelsreaksies wees (S.A. Associated Newspapers Ltd v Schoeman, 1962 (2) SA 613 (AA) C op bl. 616G - H). Die volgende gesaghebbende, regterlike uitlatings dui aan hoe daardie hipotetiese persoon gewone koerant-berigte sou 'Not . . . how an ast......
-
Kleynhans v Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk
...daar geen D culpa aan haar kant is nie. Sien Union Government v Lee, 1927 AD op bl. 223. Die dicta in Taljaard v Potgieter, 1964 (4) SA op bl. 616, is van toepassing op die instante geval. Daar kan geensins beslis word of daar 'n laaste geleentheid was vir enige bestuurder om die botsing te......
Get Started for Free