MH v GP (Child: Emigration)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
Judgment Date1995
Year1995
Date1995

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • U.v v v.U.
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 15 April 2011
    ...LR 102 L v FINLAND 2000 2 FLR 118 2000 3 FCR 219 2001 31 EHRR 30 KILKELLY CHILDRENS RIGHTS IN IRELAND 2008 128-129 HARRIS v PINNINGTON 1995 2 FLR 106 1995 3 FCR 35 D (M) v D (G) UNREP CARROLL 30.7.1992 1992/11/3403 G (E) v D (D) UNREP PEART 9.7.2004 2004/18/4177 2004 IEHC 125 MCB v E 2011 F......
  • MK v CK
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 July 2011
    ...of do so, since they may have been expressed from time to time in too rigid terms. The judgment of Thorpe J in MH v GP (Child: Emigration) [1995] 2 FLR 106 was the first time to my knowledge that the word 'presumption' had been used in the reported cases, and I would respectfully suggest th......
  • Re W (Children)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 March 2011
    ...be helpful to do so, since they may have been expressed from time to time in too rigid terms. The judgment of Thorpe J in M H v G P (Child: Emigration) [1995] 2 FLR 106 was the first time to my knowledge that the word "presumption" had been used in the reported cases, and I would respectful......
  • Payne v Payne
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 February 2001
    ...the custodial parent had therefore to be reconsidered in the light of the philosophy of the Children Act. In MH v GP (Child: Emigration) [1995] 2FLR 106 Thorpe J was asked to approve the application of a single mother to remove permanently to New Zealand with her four year old son. The fath......
  • Get Started for Free