Middleton v Steeds Hudson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Wellesley Partners LLP v Withers LLP
...a judge was entitled to prefer the evidence of one witness to another. I find it of no help in the present case. 99 The second is Middleton v Steeds Hudson [1998] 1 FLR 738 at 741E where Johnson J said: "The absence of any written record or letter supporting the defendant's account of the m......
-
Henderson & Jones Ltd v David Jason Ross
...back’ period but I have already rejected this. 642 . Nor did I find persuasive the Claimant's reliance on Middleton v Steeds Hudson [1998] 1FLR 738 (at [741]) to the effect that a letter of advice might have been expected where the client, as here, disregarded the solicitors' advice. As to ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Restitution, Rectification, and Mitigation: Negligent Solicitors and Wills, Again
...Solicitors, Disappointed Beneficiaries and the Tortious Duty toAdvise on Tax Avoidance’ (1998) 14 PN 107. cp Middleton vSteeds Hudson [1998] 1 FLR 738(Johnson J). cf Hurlingham Estates vWilde (1997) 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 525 (Lightman J); on which see R.O’Connor, ‘The Duty of Solicitors to Give Ta......