Miller v Pill; Pill v Furse; Pill v J. Mutton & Son
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1933 |
| Year | 1933 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Ferguson v Macmillan
...last foregoing paragraph to be traced and identified.". 2 24 and 25 Geo. V, cap. 50. 3 20 and 21 Geo. V, cap. 43. 4 1933 J. C. 39. 5 [1933] 2 K. B. 308. Reference was made to Avory, J., at p. 317. 6 [1951] 2 K. B. 520. 7 20 and 21 Geo. V, cap. 43. 8 24 and 25 Geo. V, cap. 50. [1933] 1 K. B.......
-
Rahill v Brady
...normally used for that purpose only were not special events within the meaning of s. 11, sub-s. 1, of the Act of 1962. Pill v. FurseELR [1933] 2 K.B. 308 considered. Rahill v. Brady PHILIP RAHILL and JOSEPH GOODE Appellants and THOMAS BRADY Respondent. [1969. No. 123 SS.] Supreme Court Lice......
1 books & journal articles
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...party,butto a special occasion which isthe objectofthe journey being undertaken. Following the reasoningin the caseofMiller v. Pill (1933 2 K.B. 308), it was heldthatbeforeit can be saidthata vehicle is being used on a special occasion theremust be some evidencethatthe journey is being unde......