Mills v Fox

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1887
Year1887

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Provincial Bank of Ireland v McKeever
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 31 July 1941
    ...the result of the free exercise of an independent will. Inche Noriah v. Shaik Allie Bin OmarELR, [1929] A. C. 127, and Mills v. FoxELR, 37 Ch. D. 153, applied. In considering whether the onus of rebutting the presumption has been discharged, the Court will have regard to the probability or ......
  • The Estates of Rev. C. M. Ottley and Patrick Leonard. (Whitney's Rent.) Whitney's Rent
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 1 November 1909
    ...given a life estate, now sufficient to pass the fee-simple. j. e. w. (1) 31 Ch. D. 251. (2) 36 Ch. D. 716. (3) [1895] 1 Ch. D. 742. (4) 37 Ch. D. 153. (1) 14 Beav. (2) 11 L. R. Ir. 522. (3) 31 Ch. D. 251. (4) 37 Ch. D. 153. (5) [1901] 1 Ch. 945. (1) 31 Ch. D. 251. (1) 36 Ch. D. 716. (1) 31 ......
  • BANDA v. PATTISON
    • Sri Lanka
    • 17 April 1919
    ...on her behalf that she was entitled in tail to certain property, she was 1 L. R. 6 H. L. 352. 2 (1723) 9 Mod. Rep. 35. 3 (1887) L. R. 37 Ch. D. 153. 137 bound in equity to make good such representation, notwithstanding her infancy at the time it was made. Stirling J., who decided the case, ......