Mills v London County Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Date1925
Year1925

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • National Trust v Planning Appeals Trib
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • December 13, 2000
    ...[1966] 3 All E.R. 863, considered. (12) Lloyd v. McMahon, [1987] A.C. 625; [1987] 1 All E.R. 1118. (13) Mills v. London County Council, [1925] 1 K.B. 213; (1924), 94 L.J.K.B. 216, distinguished. (14) R. v. Dacorum Gaming Licensing Cttee., ex p. E.M.I. Cinemas & Leisure Ltd., [1971] 3 All E.......
  • R v Greater London Council, ex parte Blackburn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • April 14, 1976
    ...Film Censors provided that that body did not have the final say, but was subject to review by the County Council itself - see Mills v. The London County Council (1925) 1 King's Bench, p. 213. That decision has held the field since - that time and must, I think, be accepted as good law. It w......
  • R v Liverpool City Council ex parte Barry
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 21, 2001
    ...for registration is refused and that retention of control is important (see Ellis v Dubowski [1921] 3 KB 62 and Mills v LCC [1925] 1 KB 213). Furthermore, as Mr King recognises, the first round of the application process cannot be considered in isolation. The applicant can discuss the matte......
  • Short v Poole Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... plaintiff, who was then unmarried, was appointed by the defendant Council certificated assistant teacher of the girls' department of Heatherlands ... Marquis of Zetland F8 ; Notley v. London County Council F9 ; Price v. Rhondda Urban Council. F10 The Court is ... ...
  • Get Started for Free