Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1979
Date1979
Year1979
CourtPrivy Council
[PRIVY COUNCIL] MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ANOTHER APPELLANTS AND COLLINS MACDONALD FISHER AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS [APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA]

1979 Feb. 26, 27; May 14

Lord Wilberforce, Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone, Lord Salmon, Lord Fraser of Tullybelton and Sir William Douglas

Bermuda - Constitution - Person deemed to belong to Bermuda - “Child” - Whether term includes illegitimate child - Bermuda Constitution Order 1968 (S.I. 1968 No. 182), Sch. 2, s. 11 (5) - Statute - Construction - Constitutional instrument - Whether rules of construction of statutes applicable

Section 11 of the Constitution of Bermuda provides:

“(5) For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to belong to Bermuda if that person — (a) possesses Bermudian status — … (c) is the wife of a person to whom either of the foregoing paragraphs of this subsection applies not living apart from such person …; or (d) is under the age of 18 years and is the child, stepchild or child adopted in a manner recognised by law of a person to whom any of the foregoing paragraphs of this subsection applies.”

The Jamaican mother of four illegitimate children all born in Jamaica married a Bermudian in 1972. The mother and the children took up residence with the husband in Bermuda in 1975. At all material times the children were under 18. In 1976 the Minister of Labour and Immigration ordered the children to leave Bermuda. The mother and her husband applied to the Supreme Court to quash the order and for a declaration that the children were to be deemed to belong to Bermuda The Supreme Court refused a declaration on the ground that the children were illegitimate. On appeal by the mother and her husband the Court of Appeal held by a majority that the children were to be deemed to belong to Bermuda by virtue of section 11 (5) (d) of the Constitution.

On appeal by the Minister of Home Affairs (formerly the Minister of Labour and Immigration) and the Minister of Education: —

Held, (1) that a constitutional instrument should not necessarily be construed in the manner and according to the rules which applied to Acts of Parliament and, therefore the presumption applicable to statutes concerning property, succession and citizenship that “child” meant “legitimate child” did not apply (post, pp. 894B–E, 895B–E).

(2) That, although the manner of interpretation of a constitutional instrument should give effect to the language used, recognition should also be given to the character and origins of the instrument; that, since section 11 of the Constitution was one of the sections dealing with the fundamental rights and freedoms of an individual and subsection (5) (d) in its context was a clear recognition of the unity of the family as a group and acceptance that children should not be separated from a group which belonged to Bermuda, “child” in the subsection was not to be restricted in its meaning and the mother and her husband were entitled to a declaration that the children were deemed to belong to Bermuda (post, pp. 895E, 896B, D–E, H).

Decision of the Court of Appeal for Bermuda affirmed.

The following cases are referred to in the judgment of their Lordships:

Brule v. Plummer (unreported), January 23, 1979, Supreme Court of Canada.

Dickinson v. North-Eastern Railway Co. (1863) 33 L.J.Ex. 91; 2 H. & C. 735.

Galloway v. Galloway [1956] A.C. 299; [1955] 3 W.L.R. 723; [1955] 3 All E.R. 429, H.L.(E.).

Reg. v. Inhabitants of Totley (1845) 7 Q.B. 596.

Sydall v. Castings Ltd. [1967] 1 Q.B. 302; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 1126; [1966] 3 All E.R. 770, C.A.

Woolwich Union v. Fulham Union [1906] 2 K.B. 240; 22 T.L.R. 579, C.A.

The following additional cases were cited in argument:

M. (An Infant), In re [1955] 2 Q.B. 479; [1955] 3 W.L.R. 320; [1955] 2 All E.R. 911, C.A.

Reg. v. Chief Immigration Officer, Heathrow Airport, Ex parte Salamat Bibi [1976] 1 W.L.R. 979; [1976] 3 All E.R. 843, C.A.

White v. Barrett [1973] 3 W.L.R. 293.

APPEAL (No. 4 of 1978) by the Minister of Home Affairs (formerly the Minister of Labour and Immigration) and the Minister of Education from a judgment (July 15, 1977) of the Court of Appeal for Bermuda (Duffus and Georges JJ.A.; Hogan P. dissenting) allowing the appeal of Collins MacDonald Fisher (the husband) and Eunice Carmeta Fisher (as mother and next friend of Cheryl Angela Morgan, Valentine Denver Morgan, Fitzroy O'Neil Stuart and Samuel Isaiah Tait (the children)) from a judgment of Seaton J. (January 6, 1977) in the Supreme Court of Bermuda whereby he refused to quash the order made by the Minister of Labour and Immigration on October 22, 1976, that the children should leave Bermuda and the order of the Minister of Education that the children be removed from suitable education at recognised schools or to grant a declaration that the children were to be deemed to possess Bermudian status by virtue of the Bermuda Immigration and Protection Act 1956 and were to be deemed to belong to Bermuda by virtue of section 11 (5) of the Constitution of Bermuda. The Court of Appeal declared that the children were to be deemed to belong to Bermuda by virtue of section 11 (5) (d) of the Constitution.

The facts are stated in the judgment of their Lordships.

Colin Ross-Munro Q.C. and Christopher Carling for the Minister of Home Affairs and the Minister of Education.

Christopher French Q.C., Julian E. S. P. Hall (of the Bermuda Bar) and Narinder Hargun for the mother and her husband.

Cur. adv. vult.

May 14. The judgment of their Lordships was delivered by LORD WILBERFORCE.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Bermuda, which by a majority (Duffus and Georges JJ.A.; Hogan P. dissenting) allowed the appeal of the respondents from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Bermuda (Seaton J.) dated January 6, 1977.

The proceedings relate to the status in Bermuda of four illegitimate children of Mrs. Eunice Carmeta Fisher (the mother), all under the age of 18. They were born in Jamaica, as was the mother herself. In May 1972 the mother married Mr. Collins MacDonald Fisher (the husband) who possessed Bermudian status. As from the date of the marriage the husband has accepted all four children as children of his family. On July 31, 1975, the mother came with the four children to take up residence with the husband in Bermuda; they were admitted by the immigration authorities, and soon afterwards were placed in state schools. Following a routine check carried out in the school year 1976–77 the husband was informed that the Ministry of Labour and Immigration had refused permission for two of the children to remain at school, and on October 22, 1976, the ministry informed the mother that she and the four children must leave Bermuda by October 30, 1976.

Separate legal proceedings (later consolidated) were then started by both the mother and the husband seeking to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
577 cases
  • CTEB and Another v Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara, Malaysia and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Watson-Morgan v Grant
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 1 August 1990
    ...[1956] A.C. 299, considered. (8) Lewis, ReUNK(1970), 15 W.I.R. 520, dicta of Douglas J. applied. (9) Minister of Home Affairs v. Fisher, [1980] A.C. 319, distinguished. (10) Osenton (Charles) & Co. v. Johnson, [1942] A.C. 130; [1941] 2 All E.R. 245, dicta of Viscount Simon, L.C. applied. (1......
  • Government of Malaysia; Merdeka University Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1981
  • Attorney General for Bermuda v Roderick Ferguson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 14 March 2022
    ...to the interpretation of constitutional rights is that laid down in the landmark case of Minister of Home Affairs (Bermuda) v Fisher [1980] AC 319 (“ Fisher”) which concerns the Bermudian Constitution. The Board adopts a “generous” approach. In that case, the Board held that Chapter 1 of th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • International Commercial Arbitration in Barbados
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 18 February 2011
    ...referred to as the European Convention on Human Rights). In the Privy Council in Minister of Home Affairs v Collins MacDonald Fisher [1980] A.C. 319, Lord Wilberforce, delivering the opinion of their Lordships in relation to an appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda, stated: "Chapter I ......
27 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1983
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...(1947) 2 All E.R. 372, 373. 471 Mills v. Cooper (1967) 2 All E.R. 100. 44 Minister of Home Affairs v. Fisher (1979) 2 W.L.R. 899; (1980) A.C. 319 at 328 229 Minister of Internal Affairs v. Shugaba Abdurrahaman Darman (1982) 2 N.C.L.R. 915 at 963. 228 Mogaji v. Nuga 5.F.S.C. 107. 457 Mogo Ch......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Offshore Commercial Law in Bermuda - 2nd Edition Preliminary Sections
    • 30 August 2018
    ...of Finance v E, F, H, and O [2014] Bda LR 54, Sup Ct of Bermuda 25.78, 25.80–25.81, 25.94–25.95 Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher [1980] AC 319, [1979] 2 WLR 889, [1979] 3 All ER 21, PC 1.54, 25.20 Morris v Raymer’s Enterprises Inc BCCI (No 8), Re [1998] AC 214, [1997] 3 WLR 909, [1997] 4 A......
  • The Development of Charter Damages Jurisprudence in Canada: Guidelines from the Supreme Court
    • South Africa
    • Stellenbosch Law Review No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...Cu ltura 2000 1994 1 SA 407 (NASC); Attorney Gener al v Momodou Jobe [1984] AC 689 (PC) 700; Minister of Home Affairs (Bermuda) v Fisher [1980] AC 319 (PC) 328 Whi le courts must be caref ul not to overshoot the actual pur poses of the Char ter’s guarantee s, they must avoid a narrow, techn......
  • Our Inherent Constitution
    • Jamaica
    • Transitions in Caribbean Law The habits of constitutionalism
    • 21 November 2013
    ...virtually unassailable in Caribbean constitutions. 103. Ibid. 104. Bowen (n 24) 54 (Conteh CJ). 105. Minister of Home Affairs v Fisher [1980] AC 319 (PC Ber). 106. Joseph (n 1) 18 (Wit J). 107. S.A. de Smith, The New Commonwealth and its Constitutions (Stevens, London 1964) 194; Fisher (n 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT